So what? Whenever an actor looks different from their character, the obvious explanation is that it’s the character design.
That might be obvious to you, but that's not what I usually think about whenever I see them on screen or in any media.
Then the obvious next question (if you have to discuss it) should be why did they make that choice for the character, not why isn’t the character more attractive?
I usually think about the actors looks first over their character portrayals.
I don't really pay attention to their characters that much in most shows.
I see the actors mostly as the actors instead of the characters that they portray most of the time.
That's usually why I mostly remember the actors name instead of their character in everything I see them in.
e.g. Tom Cruise is just "Tom Cruise" in a movie or show.
I don't see Tom Cruise as "Ethan Hunt" in the Mission Impossible Movies.
I know he's trying to portray "Ethan Hunt", but that's just part of his requirement as his acting job.
Same with most other actors in most series.
Whenever I see Patrick Stewart, I see him, not "Captain Jean-Luc Picard" more often then not.
I know he's trying to portray "Captain Jean-Luc Picard", but in my mind, I'm mostly looking at the actor.
Ergo I see Patrick Stewart acting as his most famous character that he's well known for.
That's the same with most actors trying to do their jobs, I see them for them, not their portrayals.
Their job is just that, a job to me.
