Having finished the finale, I will state that this season was, in fact, a failure. IMO, of course.
Well, I started with the Movies, not TOS.I wonder how people who watched "Where No One Has Gone Before" felt as their first introduction to TOS and then went in to Corbomite maneuver?" Was there a diminishing of expectations because certain characters didn't return?
Certainly they can, though Trek is full of recurring characters I have little connection to. But is that a waste is more my question simply that their story is done?People become invested with recurring characters.
They didn't originally air in that order. WNMHGB was third in the season; "Corbomite" was tenth.I wonder how people who watched "Where No One Has Gone Before" felt as their first introduction to TOS and then went in to Corbomite maneuver?" Was there a diminishing of expectations because certain characters didn't return?
To give a short answer to a long rant:
On PIC I decided after ep 4 or 5 this is just not worth my time. It's the only time I ever stopped watching a sci-fi show in the middle of a season, while new episodes being aired. I just don't care.
In 2017, I thought DSC would be completely serialized. One season's ongoing story would continue in the next. Then, in 2020, I thought it was going to be that way with PIC. I would only call something a failure if it failed to accomplish what it set out to do. Since it's clear now that neither of these series intended to have one season bleed into another, I can't say it was a failure at it. Now, if that was DSC or PIC's goal, then I'd agree with you.I think it was a "failure" sort of in the same sense that the first season of Picard was - or most of the seasons of Discovery, for that matter.
What I mean is that in serialized Trek what we seem to get, ironically enough, is episodic seasons. The entire season plot is self-contained, with little to no ramifications beyond the season. Not only that, but the characters themselves have repeatedly abortive arcs, twisting in the wind to work with the new plot ideas between seasons.
There was some effort to explain what happened with the passage of time between Seasons 1 and 2. But in general, everything was abandoned. The idea that Elnor thought of Picard as a father figure was gone, with a close relationship suddenly appearing with Raffi. The idea that Soji was some sort of adoptive daughter for Picard (teased in Nepenthe) was gone. Rios and Jurati broke up off camera (though at least a bit of work was done on this). The flirtation between Seven and Raffi kinda sputtered along off camera, and then sputtered along throughout this whole season. Picard being in a synth body meant nothing other than two asides. Zhaban died off camera to allow Laris to be a love interest. Rios turns from a broken man to a pretty happy-go-lucky guy off camera. Jurati is suddenly this incredibly lonely woman who will never be with anyone (never mind she had a boyfriend before she murdered him). I could keep going on, of course, but you get the idea - Where the characters ended up in Season 1 didn't really matter for season 2.
The same seems likely for Season 3. Although the closing implies that Laris might give Picard another chance, we know already she's not in the third season, meaning the entire fucking emotional arc of this season - getting Picard to overcome his own demons to let someone in - is wasted. Probably Laris is being jettisoned to placate fans who want him to have a happy ending with Beverly. I suppose removing Rios, Elnor, and Jurati, and probably Soji from the cast as well counts as consequences, but I would guess there will only be a few small asides regarding their absence, if that. Q is gone too, though I doubt his absence will be noted because it's not important to the Season 3 story. And of course since about 88% of the actual happenings too place either in 2024 or an alternate timeline, none of the little choices will have ramifications for the remaining characters in Season 3. Just disappointing, because it's ultimately as disposable as any episode of Voyager.
The Khan file was an old file from 1996. He pulled it out because he'd lost all his electronic files, so the old hardcopy file was an indication that he was going back to basics and starting again from scratch - i.e. a hint that he'd been involved with Khan's group back in the 1990s.Khan is not 1996, it's something that happened after 2024?
I don't think you can compare seeing characters for the first and only time in a single episode to seeing primary characters return throughout a series.I wonder how people who watched "Where No One Has Gone Before" felt as their first introduction to TOS and then went in to Corbomite maneuver?" Was there a diminishing of expectations because certain characters didn't return?
I guess. Characters can mean a lot to me in one episode, so it's a distinction without a huge difference to me. I see your point though.don't think you can compare seeing characters for the first and only time in a single episode to seeing primary characters return throughout a series.
I must define failure much differently. This feels more like going towards market research and wrapping up one chapter to move on to the next one.Not that I feel like I really got to know these characters (I blame the writing on that), but dropping them altogether for the sake of bringing back the well-established characters from TNG next season feels like an admission of failure.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.