• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is it time to put Star Trek to rest?

* The story is literally about a.
* The story is allegorically intended to make a statement about b.
* The story can be alternately interpreted to be about c, d, e, etc. by some viewers, despite that not being the writer's intention.

I gather the problem is that a and c, etc. have all taken a backseat to b - the story is so obviously not about c, etc. and beat for beat identical/parallel to b that a is more of a plot device than a plot.
 
Spock praises them as efficient.

Yeah. And I got reamed by my 8th grade English teacher when I repeated Spock's commentary.

Still, I doubt the episode was promoting the Nazi party.

And I don't see the moral stand with Hawking, or Lincoln either.

Agreed. Hawking's appearance was during an entirely different political climate than today. Plus, he wasn't in any way the political figure or symbol that Musk became. Likewise, Musk wasn't quite the political figure he is today when he was name dropped in Trek.

Lincoln is a revered historical figure a century removed from his Trek depiction. Likewise, that was a different political climate.
 
Whenever I see people crying over Stacey Abrams being on Disco, I feel a need to remind everyone that Melvin Belli had a guest appearance on TOS. Granted, he wasn't a politician, but he was still a well known and controversial figure of the time.
 
Yeah. And I got reamed by my 8th grade English teacher when I repeated Spock's commentary.

Still, I doubt the episode was promoting the Nazi party.
No but it shows a mixed attitude, which most contemporary references will do. It's not like that episode aired 70+ years since WW2. It was within generational memory of most viewers. As @Laura Cynthia Chambers quotes it was praised as the most efficient state Earth had known. That's quite the claim to make to your 60s audience.
 
To me, Star Trek was basically a demonstration of uplifted humans (who got their shit together) living and thriving with other races who also got their shit together in a Federation, and who created a cosmopolitan organization, Star Fleet, that went around exploring and solving sci fi problems while demonstrating their idealistic Utopian values. Everyone in Star Fleet had hit some sort of epitome of professionalism andvpersonal growth, so they always worked together w/o getting mired in mundane personal squabbles. I don't think that sells anymore because the new shows all seem to be based in tragedy, personal loss, and the potential end of the damn universe by scream or interstellar mining. 🤷‍♂️

...besides Worf, who surprisingly found a great deal of peace and temperance after the crap the Defiant comic is putting him through. 👍

star-trek-defiant-21-spock-says-his-bond-with-worf-is-no-less-strong-just-because-it-was-recently-forged.jpg
 
Last edited:
To me, Star Trek was basically a demonstration of uplifted humans (who got their shit together) living and thriving with other races who also got their shit together in a Federation, and who created a cosmopolitan organization, Star Fleet, that went around exploring and solving sci fi problems while demonstrating their idealistic Utopian values. I don't think that sells anymore because the new shows all seem to be based in tragedy, personal loss, and the potential end of the damn universe by scream or interstellar mining. 🤷‍♂️

...besides Worf, who surprisingly found a great deal of peace and temperance after the crap the Defiant comic is putting him through. 👍
TOS wasn't utopian. It could be quite anti utopian at times as Kirk notes man isn't meant for paradise but to struggle. There is cooperation but not always perfection. There is still grief, loss, as well as discovery and curiosity and mutual support.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top