Is it time to put Star Trek to rest?

[Danja]

Kirk was not always this intensive energy, but someone who put in a measure of thought, or pause, and something that comes across as boring.

The guy ... paused ... a little too ... often.

 

[Tallguy]

You’re not wrong about that!

My kids even noted that. But damn has he grown on us.

but I do like that he's not just imitating Shatner

Well... Most of the time.

And his latest go gave me total Shatner vibes. Best ever. Without doing... The... SHATNER... things.

 

[XCV330]

People were complaining they talked too much in S1 (And they want a President Archer show? )

Nothing short of President Archer jumping into a starfighter and kicking alien boo-tay a la Independence Day is going to impress anyone.

we're not like gazelles..

 

[MikHutch]

My kids even noted that. But damn has he grown on us.


Well... Most of the time.

And his latest go gave me total Shatner vibes. Best ever. Without doing... The... SHATNER... things.

In my defense I haven't seen the latest season yet

 

[Dar70]

I think STAR TREK should have been put to rest after "Enterprise". Aside from Season One of "Discovery", I haven't been impressed by the franchise's productions.

I actually thought season 5 of Discovery was good and I really enjoyed season 3 of Picard which felt like a natural extension of the Berman shows. Interesting about season 1 of Discovery. i actually thought that was it's worst.

But with the occasional episode here or there.....Yeah like you I haven't been impressed with much of the Kurtzman produced stuff either.

 

[bdub76]

I actually thought season 5 of Discovery was good and I really enjoyed season 3 of Picard which felt like a natural extension of the Berman shows. Interesting about season 1 of Discovery. i actually thought that was it's worst.

But with the occasional episode here or there.....Yeah like you I haven't been impressed with much of the Kurtzman produced stuff either.

I found watching Picard overall was enjoyable.

To the previous poster's point, I really think by time we got to ENT, the franchise was already in the burnt out phase. If ENT had come out instead of VOY, it most likely would have lasted longer.

 

[MikHutch]

I actually thought season 5 of Discovery was good and I really enjoyed season 3 of Picard which felt like a natural extension of the Berman shows. Interesting about season 1 of Discovery. i actually thought that was it's worst.

But with the occasional episode here or there.....Yeah like you I haven't been impressed with much of the Kurtzman produced stuff either.

for me, both Picard's and Discovery's last seasons were their best

while I think New Trek goes go overboard with emotionality and therapy speak, I do feel Old Trek was too stiff with this stuff sometimes

 

[Dar70]

My only problem with him is that I watched way too much Vampire Diaries.

I think he's more Kirkish in Vampire diaries... ....never did finish that show.....

 

[fireproof78]

for me, both Picard's and Discovery's last seasons were their best

while I think New Trek goes go overboard with emotionality and therapy speak, I do feel Old Trek was too stiff with this stuff sometimes

I think some of older Trek tried to hard to be Shakespeare, ignoring the idea from TOS to tell stories about people that could be relatable. And ignoring that Shakespeare's plays stood out because the average citizens didn't speak like that and it made the dialog feel very sweeping.

 

[Dar70]

for me, both Picard's and Discovery's last seasons were their best

while I think New Trek goes go overboard with emotionality and therapy speak, I do feel Old Trek was too stiff with this stuff sometimes

Well yeah. TNG was caught between time periods I guess. They had a bigger ensemble cast as opposed to shows from the 60's and the characters got more to do. But they still were in a period of little character development. They basically started anew each episode and the previous episodes events didn't really figure into things so much. Not to say they were never brought up again. Just not very often. DS9 of course was one of the first shows with an overall arch for the season and character development was a bit better. Voyager as well. Enterprise didn't really get a chance to show to much of that and kinda was a backward step. Outright ignoring Mayweather.

And then yes .... sometimes the new shows go overboard.

It's a hard balance indeed.

 

[MikHutch]

Well yeah. TNG was caught between time periods I guess. They had a bigger ensemble cast as opposed to shows from the 60's and the characters got more to do. But they still were in a period of little character development. They basically started anew each episode and the previous episodes events didn't really figure into things so much. Not to say they were never brought up again. Just not very often. DS9 of course was one of the first shows with an overall arch for the season and character development was a bit better. Voyager as well. Enterprise didn't really get a chance to show to much of that and kinda was a backward step. Outright ignoring Mayweather.

And then yes .... sometimes the new shows go overboard.

It's a hard balance indeed.

That's why I don't necessarily want New Trek to ape Old Trek too much. There are some things which have improved

But the heart to heart during every new 'galaxy will be destroyed' thing could be toned down in New Trek. I think SNW has a good balance

I think some of older Trek tried to hard to be Shakespeare, ignoring the idea from TOS to tell stories about people that could be relatable. And ignoring that Shakespeare's plays stood out because the average citizens didn't speak like that and it made the dialog feel very sweeping.

To where they thought pop culture ended at Shakespeare haha