• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is it time to put Star Trek to rest?

I think we all knew it was silly. But I won't lie. I did enjoy looking at Jolene Blalock half naked... I think they even showed her nude rear end one episode.

Tv was quickly changing by the late 90's/ early 2000's. What began in Enterprise continued into Kelvin Trek and Kurtzman Trek. The blatant sex stuff that is. Carol Marcus posing in her underwear etc.
TOS was not shy about the female form.
 
What made Star Trek a wonderful thing to encounter when it was originally being made is that on a given week it felt like it could turn out to be anything - you get a comedy this week, a character drama next week, a shoot-em-up in outer space sometimes and a symbolic morality play others.

We'd watch the "Next Week" trailers at the end of the episodes and go WTF? trying to figure them out in advance.

Like Forest Gump's mama told him: Box of chocolates to the stars.

Exacerbated by the complete lack of advance spoiler availability or press summaries other than the TV Guide paragraph, of course.

Of course, the original doesn't play that way now - its tone feels mannered and prosaic by current standards. But all the reincarnations of it, including Roddenberry's own, have played it safe by working to find a groove that the producers felt made it grown-up, respectable TV - those adjectives were used at various times by several EPs. They just were petrified of looking silly. And when they find that groove, they deliver it week after week after week like a can of Campbell's soup.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

What the Hell, I thought this was a show about space exploration?

The IP's off-the-wall storytelling potential has been largely ignored. In fact SNW is the only successor where the producers get that aspect of Star Trek as a core facet of its identity.* They've brought it back in ways that none of their predecessors ever have (at least, for more than a stray hour or two).

At least Starfleet Academy did a decent job of bringing some upbeat energy and a sense of playfulness to their new setting; apparently the influence of the carried-over STD staffers was not dispositive where the overall tone was concerned.

*Though almost everyone who's done a parody or pastiche of Trek leans into exactly this. Almost as if it's a signature of the franchise.
 
Last edited:
In fact SNW is the only successor where the producers get that aspect of Star Trek as a core aspect of its identity.* They've brought it back in ways that none of their predecessors ever have (at least, for more than a stray hour or two).

*Though almost everyone who's done a parody or pastiche of Trek leans into exactly this. Almost as if it's a signature of the franchise.
SNW has many things in common with Trek parodies.
 
What made Star Trek a wonderful thing to encounter when it was originally being made is that on a given week it felt like it could turn out to be anything - you get a comedy this week, a character drama next week, a shoot-em-up in outer space sometimes and a symbolic morality play others.

We'd watch the "Next Week" trailers at the end of the episodes and go WTF? trying to figure them out in advance.

Exacerbated by the complete lack of advance spoiler availability or press summaries other than the TV Guide paragraph, of course.

Of course, the original doesn't play that way now - its tone feels mannered and prosaic by current standards. But all the reincarnations of it, including Roddenberry's own, have played it safe by working to find a groove that the producers felt made it grown-up, respectable TV - those adjectives were used at various times by several EPs. They just were petrified of looking silly.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

What the Hell, I thought this was a show about space exploration?

The IP's off-the-wall storytelling potential has been largely ignored. In fact SNW is the only successor where the producers get that aspect of Star Trek as a core aspect of its identity.* They've brought it back in ways that none of their predecessors ever have (at least, for more than a stray hour or two).

*Though almost everyone who's done a parody or pastiche of Trek leans into exactly this. Almost as if it's a signature of the franchise.

Bonanza did the same thing. Rotating between Adventure/Action episode, heavy drama, comedy and they even did fantasy a few times. They could not do an episode every week with Little Joe losing a girlfriend or one of the Cartwright's ending up being shot/kidnapped etc. They needed to have a little fun. As big a fan as I am of the show I didn't like some of the comedy episodes. Some of it went way too far. I didn't think TOS went as far but I do think current Trek has in many regards.

I still love Bonanza at least the bulk of its 14 seasons. So I will still hold out hope that SFA ends up being a great season of Trek....
 
Space hippies and toxic grass!!!! I never made the connection before.
I go away for a few and this is what I find when I get back? I love TTBBS.

There's 25% dfferent and then there's HOW MANY DRUGS DID YOU TAKE AND WHY AM I ALSO HIGH RIGHT NOW.
I've been so stoned I could see part of my cataract replacement lens
TOS was not shy about the female form.
Bill Theiss's ghost joins the chat
Just cover the right bits. :lol:
And uncover the unexpected bits
Carolyn Palamas was about as nude as network TV allowed in 1967 and William Ware Theiss deserved THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS.
Theiss ordered his spirit gum by the barrel and applied it with a hose

and yes, showing the unexpected bits was part of the TTT
 
But all the reincarnations of it, including Roddenberry's own, have played it safe by working to find a groove that the producers felt made it grown-up, respectable TV...
SNW is the only successor where the producers get that aspect of Star Trek as a core facet of its identity.* They've brought it back in ways that none of their predecessors ever have (at least, for more than a stray hour or two).
I agree with your post but I'd dispute this in Voyager's case, which really did go for all kinds of weird stuff, especially when it hit its stride. TNG would probably never have gone for something as format-breaking as "Living Witness", nor would it have gone for comedy episodes like "Body and Soul" or something as unashamedly bizarre as "Tsunkatse", "Concerning Flight", or "Bride of Chaotica" - definitely not a show that was concerned with appearing "respectable" or "grown-up" at the expense of trying weird ideas.

Even "The Thaw" feels like something you wouldn't really see in any of the other non-TOS shows. Same for "Course: Oblivion".
 
ENT's biggest swing at "not a typical Trek episode" was probably "ANiS," but that failed spectacularly. It's best claim to fame from an originality standpoint was probably the yearlong Xindi Arc.
 
Would it surprise anyone at this point if I admitted to being very fond of Living Witness, Body and Soul, Concerning Flight, Bride of Chaotica, Course Oblivion, A Night in Sickbay, Carbon Creek and the Xindi arc?

Tsunkatse has my indifference.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top