Hey everyone, I'm new here and I'm excited to talk Star Trek with some folks.

Hey everyone, I'm new here and I'm excited to talk Star Trek with some folks.
I think you're arguing against a straw man here. The OP didn't say the inclusion of capable women diminished men.Yeah, no. No it doesn't. The presence of a capable woman on screen does not diminish the men around her except through the fact that they no longer get to be the best of everything and the automatic leader because penis. Much the same is true in reality.
Hi, male feminist here, and, um, no. No. Just... just no. The goal of feminism is to put men and women (and non-binary people) on equal footing. It works to break down a patriarchal system that condemns women for stepping outside of traditional gender roles, while also tearing asunder the same rigid structures that make the excuse that men are not much more than base animals attached to their primal emotions, like lust, and greed. Feminism is about freedom, not hate. A rising tide lifts all ships.Hey everyone, I'm new here and I'm excited to talk Star Trek with some folks.
My wife and I have been talking a lot about the recent cultural trend of feminism in our media and how we think it isn't healthy and only promotes further sexism, especially against men. See the recent season of Dr. Who, there's tons of examples of misadry. It makes me so sad! Also, we've noticed that the message seems to be that in order for woman to take more prominent roles they must either be Mary sues(where they're too good at everything) or they must be stoic or masculine(kinda like rogue one)
As much as I sincerely want discovery to be great, I'm super worried about it and I don't want them to overly politicize the show and make it out right militant. It's not the Star Trek way. Star Trek has always been beautiful and challenging, it's why I've always loved it. As a man, I still relate to Janeway(and Picard for other reasons) the most out of the captains, due to her heart and loving approach to others.
I guess what I'm trying to discuss is, what are the chances that Discovery will follow this media trend and have a forced opinion on the matter instead of an intellectual look at it? What are the chances that they'll make our new hero two dimensional? I want to see a strong female character that can be feminine and strong. I want to see her struggle and grow.
I just feel it's an important discussion for Star Trek to have.
*For the record, my wife and I are egalitarianists. Also, I've never written in forums and I really don't want to deal with trolls nor bullys. I'm not out to hurt feelings, I'm here to discuss an art I am deeply passionate about.
As a man, I still relate to Janeway(and Picard for other reasons) the most out of the captains, due to her heart and loving approach to others.
As much as I sincerely want discovery to be great, I'm super worried about it and I don't want them to overly politicize the show and make it out right militant.
My wife and I have been talking a lot about the recent cultural trend of feminism in our media and how we think it isn't healthy and only promotes further sexism, especially against men.
My wife and I have been talking a lot about the recent cultural trend of feminism in our media and how we think it isn't healthy and only promotes further sexism, especially against men. See the recent season of Dr. Who, there's tons of examples of misadry. It makes me so sad! Also, we've noticed that the message seems to be that in order for woman to take more prominent roles they must either be Mary sues(where they're too good at everything) or they must be stoic or masculine(kinda like rogue one)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.