Which does not change the fact that Star Trek 3 had much more of an insurrection in it than Star Trek: Insurrection did.Speaking of the TOS movies. In Star Trek III, Kirk assaults Federation personnell, arranges a conspiracy with his officers and together they steal the Enterprise, sabotage the Excelsior, disobey orders (especially regarding the Genesis project), then engage in conflict as free agents with the Klingon Empire, risking a war between the Klingons and the Federation. All to save the soul of a dead friend.
In IX, Picard stops an Admiral who is breaking the Prime Directive... Insurrection... not so much.
You're comparing two completely different time periods with two completely different set of values. TOS could be the 19th century, TNG the 20th.
In TNG, La Forge is Chief Engineer.
In TOS, Uhura wouldn't have been even allowed on the bridge, let alone the ship.
I think you're cerebral gets trumped by Riker flying the ship with a Quickshot 2, Worf stressing about zits, the smooth as an Android's arse quip, the emergency flotation device...
There is a thing called a sense of humor, Star Trek Insurrection is a fun movie, and more true to the TNG series
Also, Riker with the joystick? How is that any different than the joystick scene in Star Trek 2??
That wasn't a joystick, it was a manual Photon Torpedo trigger.
Chekov's torpedo trigger didn't necessarily look like a joystick, though. Riker's, on the other hand, was immediately recognizable as an off-the-shelf computer joystick.
Insurrection is good, it is hard to top a movie like First Contact, so to follow that Insurrection is awesome and is more like a TNG story and a lot of fun to watch
I said it is still a STICK, still cheesySo, its a stick same thing and cheesy
If you can't play Bubble Bobble with it, it ain't a joystick
as hell
I said it is still a STICK, still cheesyIf you can't play Bubble Bobble with it, it ain't a joystick
as hell
The torpedo mechanism in TWOK is a safety feature. Open door, pull out joystick to arm, press button to launch torpedo. It's there to prevent accidents.
The British nuclear sub 'Vanguard' has an even 'cheesier' (as you say) setup to launch its nukes. You unlock and open the safety door to the to the nuke trigger, which is LITERALLY a trigger - they have the butt of a Colt 1911 handgun, complete with trigger, which you pull to launch the nukes. I am not making this up.
The functions of the starships are modeled after naval vessels.
I'll tell you what submarines DON'T have, however - and that's a navigational joystick![]()
Where I work, i get to go aboard Carriers and subs on a routine basis...I am still looking for the navigational joystick....
I've actually just watched the first 4 films, and all of the TNG movies recently with my friend, along with watching the other 2 TOS movies.
And I've got to say, the best film out of all of them is Star Trek II obviously (mainly because it was brilliantly shot and the director re-shot scenes so many times the Shat was annoyed and didn't overact, thus equalling good acting.
But honestly, there is one moderatly good TNG film which was First Contact. I think Generations had a good concept was but so badly shot. I mean a prime example would be Picard being told he can go anywhere in time from The Nexus, so what he decides to do is go back on that bridge and take Kirk with him. Now the question is why didn't he go back in Ten-Forward when he talked with Soren and stop him then and there? It would stop Geordi being caught and tortured, and the Enterprise-D being destroyed.
Out of the TOS films 5 is by far the worst, I mean its directed by the Shat so it's not really a surprise.
As bad as FINAL FRONTIER is? Nemesis is not only worse, it doesn't even beat V's box-office take. And that was with 2003 dollars...
Rob
I think Insurrection is a much more mature and cerebral adventure,
Actually the "slow death" had begun much earlier, in 1992 when TNG's ratings peaked.Insurrection did indeed begin the slow death of the franchise.
Yeah, drag TNG into the major plotline of a show nobody's watching. That'll put asses in the seats. Let's just put a little beanie that says "producer" on your head and call you Rick Berman.A tng/dominion war movie would have been much cooler if done well, and probably kept trek alive a little longer.
I was 14 when FC came out, and I was obsessed with it, and all things Trek at that point.
When INS came out, even the younger version of me came out of the theatre disappointed. I agree that it was the beginning of the end for Berman-era Trek. But Insurrection, upon rewatching it, isn't as poor as Nemesis.
In IX, Picard stops an Admiral who is breaking the Prime Directive... Insurrection... not so much.
In IX, Picard stops an Admiral who is breaking the Prime Directive... Insurrection... not so much.
The Prime Directive didn't apply. The Baku weren't natives or even truly a pre-warp culture.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.