Re: imdb lists THEIR opinion of the top 20 sciffy flicks of past 20 ye
I'm fine with Avatar and agree with those who said Dark City and The Incredibles deserve spots on that list, but the one most glaring omission to me is Children of Men. That movie is simply spectacular and definitely better than at least half the movies on the list. (imho)
No doubt! I can't believe more of us haven't noticed that omission. Quite an excellent film, and very good sci-fi.
Yes, and to echo others in this thread (and I can't believe I missed this one) is 12 Monkeys.
You are much, much more forgiving than I, my friend. A list that long of hard-to-swallow moments, plus a lame stock villain and the plot brought to a screeching halt to shoehorn in a really rather useless cameo by Leonard Nimoy (which introduced further plot absurdities) - it was all just too much for me.
You're right, those elements were also less than desirable. In retrospect, I'm not sure how I liked the movie at all.

. I dunno, maybe my I was partially blinded to all the flaws in the movie by the cast (which I though was almost all spot-on perfect), the action, the heart - especially the opening scene with Kirk's father and the relationship between Kirk and Spock and Kirk and Mccoy which I though was handled very well.
The irony is I'd been an advocate of recasting the original crew for at least 15 years, and I really liked most of the new actors. For the first three minutes of the film I thought they'd really nailed it, because to me Trek is less about intellectualism (which, even in its best moments was still tv shallow) than about heart. Sadly, after the main title came up - I wasn't seeing a lot of heart.
I totally agree with you. I loved the new actors. Love the new Kirk, Spock and Mccoy. All the other actors were comptently filling their predecessors shoes........I guess from that perspective, that gives me a lot of hope in that they got the cast right and that's near impossible to overcome if you don't at least do that right.
And I also agree with the heart in the first 15 minutes....it was brilliant. Great action, suspense, heart-break.......it had everything and the rest of the movie never quite got back there. That being said, we know they're capable of that writing and hopefully if they're not having to juggle an "origin" story of character everyone's known for 40 years, the focus will be more on the type of action we got in the first 15 minutes. Can you tell I'm in one of those "hope springs eternal" type of moods today?
As a general rule, Trek movies blow. That's part of why I'm doubtful that a movie series without a tv series will really extend the franchise's lifespan much.
Agreed. I meant to touch on this as well. I think the next movie should launch a new series. Not neccessarily a new Enterprise series with the cast of the movie, (though that'd be awesome) but let someone from the new team try a new perspective on a new series that takes a few chances but stays true to the spirit of the series. That's ultimately what the movies are to me........a springboard for another 5-7 year series that we can really savor like TNG or DS9.
That may be the main source of our difference of opinion. I don't find Abrams' work all that impressive. I'm watching Lost now and it's entertaining enough, but I've seen a lot of stunt plotting and beautiful people, but very little heart so far.
Not sure where you are in the series right now so it's hard to respond. Suffice to say in there were plenty of moments throughout the series that had me in shock, tears, laughter or all of the above at times. Yes, the people were pretty (for the most part) but after season 1, I didn't really felt like that was much of a factor and the story really took over towards the end of Season 1.
I haven't seen Fringe, but I have seen some other movies by Orci and Kurtzman, and they were utterly forgettable.
Well, the first Season of Fringe would probably be pretty forgettable for you as well. It wasn't until the very end of Season 1 and then the last 2/3 rd's of Season 2 that the series really started to live up to it's potential. It's only been out for a couple of seasons so if you had the time and inclination, it might be worth your time to get caught up as Season 3 has been very strong out of the gate. As Walter's character arc unfolds, the show definitely shows a lot of heart but there's a fair amount of "forgettable" stuff in Season 1 to get through until you get there. (though everything does end up being important in the end and ties into the main arc)
But see, I think where TOS went off the rails was generally around STIII/ IV. Entertaining, sure, but parodies of their former selves, and certainly not what I'd like to see emulated in further Trek projects.
Yeah......I'd have to agree with this as well, at least where the original cast was involved. Generations made efforts to get back to a more thoughtful, philosophical Trek and were appreciated even if they fell flat in places. First Contact's take on Moby Dick was pretty outstanding in places (though I didn't care for the planet-side goofiness nearly as much). Still, the "here, no further" scene has to rank among in the top 5 best scenes in all of the trek movies(behind, of course, the last 20 minutes of ST : II) Come to think of it, I'd say all the TNG movies definitely tried to stay true to the core of what made the series so good, even if they failed to do so in the last couple of movies.
Trek has always been a hit or miss kind of thing with fantastic episodes sprinkled among purely serviceable ones and sometimes downright awful stuff. That's why it's always done better in a tv series format.
I couldn't agree more. The best trek is the week to week stuff that yields the occasional brilliant episode and allows for character arc growth over time.