I don't really care who directs as long as they try something different.
If it hadn't been for the true fans (of which Lin is) there would be no Star Trek franchise for Abrams to use as his stepping stone to Star Wars.I'm not too familiar with Abrams' overall body of work, but lest we forget, if his production and direction of ST09 and STID had produced bombs, Lin would've never had the chance to do number three. Like him or not, Abrams returned "Star Trek" to relevancy. Of course, I guess one can always wonder how much better he would've done had he actually been a fan of "Star Trek" like Lin is.
Abrams or Lin would be great for the next film. Let's just keep Michael Bay away from the franchise.![]()
Touche.If it hadn't been for the true fans (of which Lin is) there would be no Star Trek franchise for Abrams to use as his stepping stone to Star Wars.
The idea that a director needs to be a "true Star Trek fan" (whatever that means) is pretty silly and already proven untrue.
But Kurtzman and Orci are just awful if you ask me.
It wasn't specifically, no.If that's a reply to me
I find Abrams is the worst modern director for pacing and character interactions as well.
Couldnt agree more JJ n his team got ST noises unis etc correct but not the character interactions and feel.
I think there is some confusion here - JJ was the director, not the script writer. And what's really important is the script. If JJ wants to direct again, that would be okay (he at least should be respected as the guy who made Trek on screen a commercial proposition again), but he needs writers who won't make the mistakes of the previous films.Beyond was a very very good film but STID and ST09 had more depth in plot while beyond had more depth with characters especially for Kirk, Spock, Jaylah and Uhura.
This.Let's just keep Michael Bay away from the franchise.![]()
For two reasons
1. JJ Abrams action scenes are better because they are more intense
2. He can take on a heavy plot and direct it well.
Please does anyone feel the same way?
I just don't want Kurtzman and Orci to ever write for Star Trek again.
And I think it's nice to have somebody directing who actually likes Star Trek. Unlike JJ.
No to Pegg too. He had his shot and blew it.The story for this movie is lot more straight-forward, and the characters are given more room to breath, while still managing to cram in more action. So, yeah, dump the old writers and get Pegg and his writing partner to do the next one also.
No to Pegg too. He had his shot and blew it.
Still full of plot holes and silliness, frantic action, a motorbike sequence...hard to tell what difference Pegg made.If that is blowing it, he should keep doing it. He's pleasing the audience.
Still full of plot holes and silliness, frantic action, a motorbike sequence...hard to tell what difference Pegg made.
And it appears to be a significantly smaller audience.[/QUOTE
Pegg n Jung had 6 months to write a plot/script due to JJ boys Orchi etc. crapping the bed with their craptastic rejected script. Didn't like the motor bike either, but Beyond felt more like original ST than any movie I've seen in quite some time. TOS on the 5 year mission was AWESOME
Not sure I like bringing George Kirk back, let James T. get over it already and mature finally like he seemed to at end of Beyond
Still full of plot holes and silliness, frantic action, a motorbike sequence...hard to tell what difference Pegg made.
And it appears to be a significantly smaller audience.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.