Wingsley,
For me, it wasn't just the Akira resemblance. It was the excessive glowing of the nacelles, the navi-deflector arrangement, and the excessive details on the surface of the hull overall that gave the NX-01 a way-too-TNG-ish look.
Actually the surface detail even though it looks like later trek ironically does produce the illusion of a simpler less complicated design. After all modern things tend to have cleaner, sleeker lines. The low surface detail seen in TOS actually looks extremely high tech.
Technically though, the Daedalus-Class which was only designed 10-years after the NX-Class also had a very low degree of surface-detail, so I suppose it would not be entirely unreasonable to have a ship designed with similar surface detail characteristics.
The warp-nacelle issue I can understand. The grilles are too big and there are both inboard and outboard grilles which does look much like later trek. It is ironic to note though that the larger grilles and the inboard and outboard placement used in TMP and later ST actually looks lower-tech than the TOS set-up.
Technically, as previously mentioned with the Daedalus-class, a similar-era design as the NX-class, the Daedalus class didn't have huge engine-grilles -- technically it didn't have any visible grilles. Regardless, the NX-Class is a faster design and its higher energy output with the technology available might have required visible grilles
(and it is a slightly older design than the Daedalus), although I don't think the outboard grilles would have been necessary.
Everything surrounding the NX-01, including the "go to warp" FX, were TNG-ish.
I just figured they used the same SFX used in the TNG/DS9/VOY era. I don't know how big a deal this is truthfully since older ships
(Movie-Era) appearing in TNG had the same warp-effect as the other TNG-era designs.
I thought it was very heavy-handed on the part of Berman & co.; their way of saying, once again, "TOS is yesterday's news... we are the real STAR TREK now!"
Well, I can agree with that -- they just re-wrote the past.
...but the ship being armed with "phase cannons", "phase pistols", etc. was definitely a bigger offense.
Completely Agree...
If the NX-class had been more conservatively designed and equipped to fit better into TOS continuity, she would have these characteristics:
Well, first of all I wouldn't have called it the NX-class. I would have called it the Enterprise-Class. After all, the first ship of the class was called Enterprise...
A simpler, less busy design
Agreed -- it should have surface-detail level similar to that of the Daedalus-Class.
An engine room that did not look like a steampunked TNG engine room.
Well truthfully speaking the engine-room looked way better than the TNG engine design. Still I would have wanted the engineering room to look more like the TOS Enterprise set-up though none of that primary-colored stuff and the computer displays and such used in ENT.
Transporters, IF so equipped, would be a much bigger deal to operate, requiring coordination from the Bridge and/or Engine Room and also more than one person to operate (as in "The Cage"); the de/mat process would also take longer.
I would oppose the use of transporters entirely...
Externally, I don't see the catamaran-shape fitting into TOS continuity. I could see an ancestor of my Herman, or something at least vaguely resembling the TAS Bonaventure. The nacelles would not glow nearly as much, if at all. Portholes would be a relative rarity.
I agree, the twin-boom look doesn't really fit in with TOS. I've never seen the Animated Series except in drawings in books...
Well the grilles glowing is a nice effect, but it can't be taken too far...
I was surprised by the size of the NX-01's crew. (83???) I was expecting 100-200, but I can live with the crew's size.
I see your point, especially considering it was almost the size of a TOS-era D-7.
Because of Spock's "Balance of Terror" history lesson, I don't think shields were around for the NX-01.
If you can produce a navigational deflector, you can produce a forcefield...
For weapons, I would expect crude lasers and fusion torpedos (a "Spaceflight Chronology" reference) to fit in well as "primitive atomic weapons".
Agreed...
My NX-01 would likely have a maximum speed of only Warp 4.0, with a typical cruise of Warp 3.0-3.5.
Well, I would have went with the higher warp-speed but I would have had it come with a price. Complicated, maintenance intensive and temperamental compared to other ships. It could be used to explain away the reason why the Daedalus and other ships developed around 10 years later were slower.
Oh, and I almost forgot: if ENT were to be set in the years leading up to the founding of the Federation, there would be no "Star Fleet". Maybe a "Solar Fleet".
Well I don't know about Solar-Fleet. But some kind of organization or military service
other than Star Fleet as it didn't form until 2161.
And no technologically-advanced Klingons, either.
Agreed, from what I remember the Klingons were roughly as advanced as the Federation in technological capability at least in TOS.
Out of curiousity: When did the Federation first even encounter the Klingons?
Praetor,
The idea of the ship being 'Warp Five' rated didn't bother me at first when they weren't achieving it without shaking the ship to pieces... it was when they started routinely traveling that fast and above that bothered me. I kept expecting them to say they were going to have to recalibrate the warp scale. (An unseen recalibration might help retcon some of that away, really.)
Nah, I don't think the Warp 4.5 cruise was a big deal, even smoothly -- The ship was obviously highly advanced for it's era. Like an SR-71 of it's day.
I would have just written into the plot that the ship was kind of temperamental and had higher maintenance requirements than other vessels which would show that the extra speed came with a price.
And just as I cringed when I saw the Klingon in the corn field
Agreed... that was just so wrong
I cringed when I heard utterance of 'Starfleet.' I really felt that Starfleet was something that should have been omitted. Use UESPA instead... mentioning it later helped, but there should have been no Starfleet.
Agreed
'Enterprise' shouldn't have had a transporter at all, if you ask me. Maybe one episode about it being developed, maybe the Vulcans have it, but not Earth. Shuttles!!!
Actually, I don't have any evidence that the Vulcans had it first...
I also don't like the plot re-done to have the Vulcans trying to restrain humans from traveling to outer-space. From what was written Pre-ENT, the Vulcans helped humans dramatically improve their Warp-drive technology
- Andorians have saucer-style ships evocative of Earth ships as seen on Enterprise, and Earth ships strongly resemble the Andorian ships seen on Enterprise; Vulcan ships are largely the same and faster and more advanced; Andorian and Vulcan technology on a par.
From what I remember, prior to Enterprise, the Vulcans' fastest ships were in the Warp 4 range. Granted there were no vessels in the Federation prior to ENT in that time frame that could do Warp 5...
- Terra Prime is a much more important factor in the Earth political climate, and a vocal opponent of Earth's space military deployments
That is actually a good idea. The Vulcans "holding Earth" back didn't strike me as a good plot device anyway.
Politicians always seem to prevent us from advancing in the areas that matter and always want to advance in the ways that have no benefit to us...
- Andorians essentially the same as presented on 'Enterprise;' boundary wars and mistrust of Vulcans feature heavily
Dunno enough about the Andorians to honestly agree or disagree there...
- Romulans feature prominently later but are shown in armor that hides their features to our heroes and are known for kamikaze and self destruct tactics prompting the Earth military to order no surrender, destroy on site
Did they
(Earth vs Romulans) fight up-close and in-person
(like people on the ground fighting) in ENT? I'm sorry -- I didn't watch ENT much...
Otherwise, if they were on ships why does it matter? The Romulans could have always used voice only transmissions or even data-only
(text).
Regardless, in TOS and Pre-TOS
(not counting ENT) were the Romulans known to use Kamikaze attacks? If so, I assume like with self-destruct it would be a desperate move if that was perceived by them to be the only option right?
- Tellarites fill in the greedy Ferengi-type quota; are honorable but business-savvy traders and merchants and are actually known as capable soldiers when properly motivated - think wild boars with guns
Wild boars with guns? I like that...
- Orion government is corrupt, all pretty much pirates
That's logical...
Regarding how I would re-imagine the NX-01 Enterprise; I think these drawings
(none of these are done by me) describe my point of view best. I am not certain who created these, but to my knowledge these images appeared on Ex Astris Scientia.
The best idea I have would basically involve
1.) Using the saucer from the second image with the exception of
-The bottom part of the saucer
(which is flat) to have the same basic shape as the top side of the saucer
(though a bit flatter than the top area)
-The windows being moved up a bit higher as the rim only has room for one deck and having the windows that low is kind of weird.
-The bridge module would be essentially basically of the same circumference as that of the NX bridge section and placed dead center on the saucer
(unlike in the drawing which has it slightly forward)
2.) Using an afterbody-shape
(the area that trails behind the saucer and the nacelles connect to) similar to that used in the first and second drawings:
-From the top view, the afterbody I would make look more like the first image in terms of basic lateral width, the fact that the afterbody runs through both the top and bottom saucer, and the fact that it's shape is simpler
-From the side view, thicknesses more like that of the second-image
-My idea would feature a slightly longer afterbody with the impulse engines on the back of the afterbody similar in shape to the first-image.
3.) Warp engines I'm thinking would be best based on the second image
-I would have the bussard intake start just in front of where the nacelle begins to increase in diamater in the middle. In otherwords the bussard intake would start at the front of the widest part of the nacelle
(this would shorten the nacelle a bit)
-I'd slightly increase the length of the area of the thickest part of the nacelle
-I would increase the tapering from where the nacelle goes from the widest section towards the normal diameter as it heads rearwards
(basically the widest section would less abruptly narrow down towards the rear)
-Remove the coil-ring
(it looks like a black groove) around the aft section of the nacelle where it tapers back to the width of the rest of the nacelle
(the front area should remain)
-No grilles outboard at all
-Inboard grille set-up with two grilles
(top and bottom) on the thickest section with the rear section featuring a long single grille much like that used on TOS
-Since the Daedalus-Class nacelle had these circular ribs on the nacelles, I think a set up with three ribs on the wider section of the nacelle, and four on the rear would be good.
4.) Pylon-wise, I would want to use the third drawing as a base to work with. The thickness of the pylons is pretty good, but I wouldn't want them swept at all.
5.) As for the Navigation deflector I have three ideas
5a.) Since the afterbody runs through the top and bottom of the saucer, especially when you consider that I wanted the bottom to have a convex curve to lower saucer
(with the nav dome on the most extreme bottom), the underside of the saucer can have
- Two to four small nav-deflector dishes
(no radar antennae style just a dent) on the front of the lower saucer
- An ovalized nav-deflector on the front of the lower saucer
5b.) The saucer rim can have an ovalized nav-deflector in the front. I'd prefer a glowing type without a pointy antenna.
5c.) The lower saucer can have 1-3 small deflectors as an auxiliary system with the main dish much like the 5b proposal.
What do you think of my idea? Do you like it?
CuttingEdge100