No, Picard and his people initially thought the Baku were local primatives, they were wrong on both counts, and their misconception didn't last long.the Feds were initially clueless that they were that advanced
Where in the movie did the Baku ever clain sovereignty?Therefore the Baku's claim of sovereignty on the planet is rock solid
Where in the movie did the Baku ever clain sovereignty?
It was a figure of speech. I was saying that the Baku are the rightful owners of the planet and don't forfeit it on the technicality of not evolving there.
Picard: " They won't begin the procedure while the planet is still inhabited. So our job is to keep the planet inhabited."Picard did not use the Baku as human shields,
For the majority of the movie, the Sona went out of their way to avoid harming the Baku. Starfleet personal not so much.it's already established the Son'Na and the Admirals team have no problem doing whatever to the Baku
You're calling people Nazis when there is not cause to. How do you feel about the concept of eminent domain in US law? This might be along the lines of what some people are thinking of. And of course, there is the idea within Trek about the needs of the many outweighing the needs of the few or the one. I don't believe that makes Mr. Spock a Nazi.Do I really need to explain it, PW? Seriously? Think about what the Nazis did, which included dehumanizing people, stealing land, property, possessions, and livelihoods, and rounding people up and relocating them forcibly, in the name of the German people. I'm talking about the ends justifying the means, which I find distasteful, and really, makes my previous response all the more accurate. Even though we are talking about a fictional people and plot here, I find it is really shocking that there are actually people here who think it is OK to steal from other people, because it might benefit themselves\their own people. That is about as far away from the message Gene Roddenberry wanted to promote, as you can get. So, yeah, good little Nazis is quite accurate. I wasn't directing my statement at any single individual, but the sentiment that it is OK to steal from a people, or deprive them of their land or property and forcibly relocate them. If someone thinks I am referring to them specifically, maybe that's a guilty conscience talking. If someone is offended by that, maybe they need to look in the mirror and ask if that was done to them, would they still support it. Anyone being honest, wouldn't. And anyone who still would support it, ought to be ashamed of themselves, whether they are talking about something real, or hypothetical.
Picard: " They won't begin the procedure while the planet is still inhabited. So our job is to keep the planet inhabited."
For the majority of the movie, the Sona went out of their way to avoid harming the Baku. Starfleet personal not so much.
If the Sona cared nothing for the Baku, they would have began the collection of the particles shortly after the Enterprise left orbit. With the Baku still on the surface.
Admiral Dougherty by this time was isolated and powerless.
Arent the Sona also the rightful owners of the planet.It was a figure of speech. I was saying that the Baku are the rightful owners of the planet and don't forfeit it on the technicality of not evolving there.
Arent the Sona also the rightful owners of the planet.
What if there were a Klingon colony on the other side of the planet. Would these guys be the rightful owners of a planet in Federation space too.
I think let the Sona and Baku battle out their own civil war.Have the Federation set up hospital colonies on the planet out of the way of the Baku and Sona.
Or send containers of the particle to hundreds of thousands of hospitals on planets all across the Federation..Have the Federation set up hospital colonies on the planet
They gave up their right to it when they left, after loosing the civil war.Arent the Sona also the rightful owners of the planet....
I think let the Sona and Baku battle out their own civil war.
if there was a Klingon Colony on the planet that was founded in 2066 instead of the Baku, then yes, it would be a Klingon planet and the Federation would never claim it because it would already be part of the Klingon Empire. As it stands the Federation controls the space around the planet but have no claim on the planet itself, except by right of conquest which the Federation claims not to practice.What if there were a Klingon colony on the other side of the planet. Would these guys be the rightful owners of a planet in Federation space too.
The Sona didn't "leave," they were forced out. Any claim the Baku might have would be shared by the Sona.They gave up their right to it when they left, after loosing the civil war.
They didn't originate on that planet, they stumbled upon it, and from everything we see they felt perfectly entitled to take advantage of their good fortune while denying the benefits to others.
I have a serious problem with the idea that any group of people is willing to deny medical benefits to a much larger number of people simply because it would detract from a privileged way of life that they were lucky enough to bumble across.
But those benefits (the natural way) would take a protracted period of time, in some cases years. And not everyone with a serious medical condition would have that much time. The movie made clear that the particles after collection would have accelerated healing abilities.especially when there was the alternatives of others coming to the planet and getting the benefits that way
You're calling people Nazis when there is not cause to. How do you feel about the concept of eminent domain in US law?
The movie made clear that the particles after collection would have accelerated healing abilities.
And given that there's the option of distributing the collected particles so they could help billions
Have the Federation set up hospital colonies on the planet out of the way of the Baku and Sona.
But those benefits (the natural way) would take a protracted period of time, in some cases years. And not everyone with a serious medical condition would have that much time. The movie made clear that the particles after collection would have accelerated healing abilities.
And given that there's the option of distributing the collected particles so they could help billions, why should those same billions of people have to travel to the planet and spend years there to receive the benefit of the particles?
Completely disrupt their lives, family life, careers, abandon their homes and communities.
Better the particles came to them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.