Season 4 wasn't even that much better than S3, it was just the publicity effect of having a new showrunner that mainly got people back in.
Then again, Coto finally gave them the continuity porno they always wanted so I guess there is something to spinelessly pandering to the audience.
Spinelessly pandering...?!
I had to jump in here, and say - what?! Here's a newsflash - this is a television show, its
supposed to 'pander' to its audience! We aren't just some 'fortunate souls' who are 'privileged' enough to view these god-made programs. Television shows are
supposed to entertain their audience.
Manny Coto came in saved B&B's asses, but it was too little, too late. If actually delivering on the original premise of the show (for a change) is what you call a 'continuity porno' then obviously we have a very different view of things.
I, for one, appreciated Coto giving us a prequel to TOS, rather than TNG Mark III, masquerading as a prequel. And I watched Enterprise on DVD
after the show had been cancelled, so there was no 'publicity effect' to 'get me back in'.
Personally, I feel that season one of Enterprise is better than season one of TNG.
And people, can we please stop the bitching and moaning about the theme song? Not that I'm a fan or anything, but I truly believe Trek fans can bolster their arguments with stonger facts then, "the theme song sucks, I'm not watching the show" Aren't we better than that?
Pfft,
anything is better than season of TNG. You'll get no argument from us.
Though I agree about the theme song, seriously, its not a big deal. I too wish people would stop acting as if a crappy theme song is a reason not to like or watch a TV show - crappy writing and the same old stories we've seen hundreds of times before are real reasons not to like a TV show.
I loved the show. It had some fantastic characters, and had potential to be phenomenal. But, sloppy writing really cut down on its quality which was a crying shame.
*Let us get to know Elizabeth (The Elder) Tucker before you kill her off. Even if it's just glimpses of letters between her and Trip, it would make her death seem even more devastating and less random if the audience got to know her, as well.
*Make T'Pol less of a sex-object. And for the love of all things holy, get that girl some decent Vulcan robes! I love the thought of her being an unusual Vulcan who never really knew her place in the universe, and joined these strange Humans to figure it out.
*The TripxT'Pol relationship needed to be kept, but with some re-vamping.
To sum up: They should have let this develop naturally, and then left it to evolve on its own. Being one of the first Vulcan/Human couples would've created drama on its own, without any help.
*Chuck the Temporal Cold War. Lame concept and poorly executed.
*MORE FIRST CONTACT! This is Earth's first deep space exploration mission. We should have seen new worlds, new places, been introduced to well known species for the first time. (E.g. Betazoids)
* I have to agree with The Badger. Everything was far too formalized for such an early mission. Make it new, exciting, a touch bizarre for everyone involved and just a tad chaotic. The universe is re-organizing itself with the appearance of Humans on the scene in a big way, let that be felt in the storytelling. And Anwar, they could have started out very different, followed by a slow progression towards what is known and loved in the Trek-verse.
I agree with all of your points wholeheartedly
Wolfishly!
At least Seven had
more of a reason to wear catsuits (though I think there are outfits which are sexier and more tasteful than catsuits!), why would a Vulcan?
I think the time period they chose, the 2150s, was perfect. It was a great idea to flesh out the founding of the Federation. They should have focused much more on this storyline from the beginning.
I like the idea of less alien races. They should have focused on ones the audience was already familiar with. Season Four proved they could make good stories without relying on the tired old "Alien of the Week" theme.
You can't go wrong with more visits to Vulcan! I would add that they should have visited Andoria regularly as well. At least a few visits to Tellar would have been awesome.
I'll have to disagree with that one. Star Trek without space battles isn't Star Trek IMO.
I can see the logic behind this, but I also think it wouldn't quite work. If the show was set earlier maybe. But by the 2150s, humanity had 90 years to make the new warp tech reliable.
They should have done what they did with the transporter with the weapons as well. Show that the characters still prefer a good old bullet-use gun. They only slowly come to accept the phase pistols, like they do with the transporter.
I personally love Phlox. However, it would have better, IMO, to have him be from a perviously established race. Maybe a Tellarite?
I don't think it's dumb. I think the whole point of the show was to show that they were all completely unprepared for what faced them and had to learn on the job, especially Archer. Though, I will admit the writers showed this in a truly pathetic and haphazard way.
I don't know. I prefer just to suspend disbelief and believe the technology in TOS and early TNG was always as advanced, or more so, than what we see in ENT (even though it obviously isn't from a production point of view).
They should have been introduced much later than the very first episode. Maybe bring them in halfway through the series.
I also completely agree with your points
Admiral Shran. Especially MORE Vulcan and Andor, and Tellar - we know literally next to nothing about the Tellarites, except that they're pig-like people who like to argue... This wouldn't be an issue, except that Enterprise itself established Tellar as a founding Federation member!
And Phlox was great (cause he actually had something resembling a personality and character development...) but I agree, a known race would have worked just as well!
What's up with everyone's obsession with the previously established races? The Federation is supposed to be comprised of some 180 worlds or so (don't shoot me if I can't remember how many exactly or if I got the number wrong), how many of them have we actually seen or heard about in TOS, TNG and DS9? And then you have to take into account that many of the alien races in the later shows weren't known in the 22nd century.
Well, IMO at least, our 'obsession' is due to the fact that Enterprise is supposed to be a prequel series. To me, at least, that implies that we're going to see how Humans got from First Contact WW3-era to TOS and a founding member of the Federation.
That means (again, imo) that we should see the races which were established in TOS and (maaaybe) to some extent TNG - but I can agree that Bolians and Betazoids, as well as Ferengi and Borg and Cardassians, should
not show up (if only B&B agreed).
Prequel doesn't really imply 'alien of the week' to me, if we're going to see Humans exploring pre-Federation, then they should be discovering future Federation member worlds, and future enemies (or neutral races, like Orions). They should be learning about those races and slowly forming alliances or grudges which could then believably evolve into the relationships shown in TOS.
Instead, the Vulcans knew about pretty much everyone. The Klingon Empire
could have been as mysterious as the Dominion was at the start of DS9 - this vast destructive power which conquers worlds and thus slowly expands its own borders. Maybe Enterprise could have skirted the edges of Klingon space, there might have been a few skirmishes - but visiting Qo'noS in a couple of days, in the pilot?!
The Xindi could have been the Romulans - they were supposed to have a war with Earth, weren't they? Replace Xindi weapon with Romulan weapon, remove the Sphere Builders, have Enterprise launch a nuke at Romulus and there we go, Xindi replaced in a way that fits known canon.
more development for all the characters - they should have made it a real ensemble show like DS9 instead of trying to focus on the 'big 3'
I
completely agree!