Noted for future reference. Now let's drop it.
Something else you might want to note for future reference: You don't get to decide when a discussion is over.
Noted for future reference. Now let's drop it.
I think it's just a premium member perk.
Also noted for future reference. But I do get to decide when I will cease to participate. That time is now.
You don't agree with not wearing masks, but you do agree with undermining scientists, which is just as damaging, not only in this pandemic but elsewhere.
You explained they had good reasons and I pretty much agree, I only wish I had anticipated their reasons not being based on much real information on the virus at the time but things like conserving masks and to keeping the focus on washing hands. Dont cases in that period matter or is it only the ones Trump caused?
That's exactly what they were saying in this Feb 29, 2020 NYT article.You explained they had good reasons and I pretty much agree, I only wish I had anticipated their reasons not being based on much real information on the virus at the time but things like conserving masks and to keeping the focus on washing hands..
You can probably count on him doing the opposite. "Totally overblown, I barely felt anything, wearing masks is for suckers..."Trump's responsibility was to set an example for the nation (which I hope he will now do, now that he is experiencing the virus firsthand)
ETA: Trump, highly infectious, took the opportunity for a nice driveby, greeting his adoring fans. In a sealed car, how nice for the secret service people who had to accompany him. Are you @%$#*-ing kidding me?!
Please ignore the first sentence of this post.
The CDC and WHO were operating based on past precedent with other coronaviruses like SARS and MERS until they learned enough about Covid-19 to adapt to it and formulate a response. That's what you're supposed to do. Your criticism is like blaming them for not being psychic and knowing every detail of this novel coronavirus from the start.You explained they had good reasons and I pretty much agree, I only wish I had anticipated their reasons not being based on much real information on the virus at the time but things like conserving masks and to keeping the focus on washing hands. Dont cases in that period matter or is it only the ones Trump caused?
This isn't a disagreement over tax policy or government regulation. People are dying by the tens of thousands and you and others are spreading irresponsible misinformation that discourages other ill-informed people from listening to the experts, and it's unacceptable and dangerous.But what are you suggesting here that doesnt undermine them, spin it in a positive way or be silent about it? Not much acceptance of different views here if instead of sharing their own experiences, it becomes attacking the next guy until they entrench in a position or leave.
Oh, for god's sake. Do you guys all get your information from the same place? That is a gross mischaracterization of what happened and the reasoning for it. Stop with the misinformation.The only thing that I can think of is the Mask thing, and that wasn't Trumps fault, it was the CDC, Who, and Fauci and other doctors who said that Masks weren't needed. They could have just said, Yes, please use a mask, but please try to save N95's and other surgical masks for first responders and hospitals, wear a bandana, scarf, some type of cloth face covering. But they didn't, they said don't bother there useless.
Just based on the ridiculous panic buying that went on regarding toilet paper (among other things) I'm betting that would not have worked.They could have just said, Yes, please use a mask, but please try to save N95's and other surgical masks for first responders and hospitals, wear a bandana, scarf, some type of cloth face covering.
Masks are pretty mush useless in preventing a wear from getting an airborne disease; you need a fit-tested respirator for that. You wear the non-respirator masks to prevent the wearer of the mask from spreading the disease. IOW, this is why you are wearing the masks:
They never said that masks weren't needed. They said that based on what they knew at the time, the costs outweighed the benefits. Besides compromising the supply to healthcare workers if the general public had stockpiled masks in that critical period, costs included the risks of exposure from a false sense of security, from incorrect usage, and from potential self-contamination by incorrectly handling moist masks while disposing of them.The only thing that I can think of is the Mask thing, and that wasn't Trumps fault, it was the CDC, Who, and Fauci and other doctors who said that Masks weren't needed. They could have just said, Yes, please use a mask, but please try to save N95's and other surgical masks for first responders and hospitals, wear a bandana, scarf, some type of cloth face covering. But they didn't, they said don't bother there useless.
Well we do know that practically No One wears the masks right, they continuly ajust it, glasses fog up cuz its ill fitting and the air just goes in and out the top or side, wearing throw away types for weeks instead of after every use. and the "gaiters" are worse than nothing since its said if you sneeze with it on it aerisolizes it.. So masks as uses is a basically better than nothing approach, not saying not use them, especially for those who are at risk.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.