I would love to see someone make a remake of Sink the Bismark, or a modern film about the Battle of Midway. I just feel with today's VFX technology, the scale and violence of these encounters could be truly realized.
If only folks would wake up and realize the mail will get delivered, the roads and sewers will get repaired,
Has anybody ever made a movie about the 1787 Constitutional Convention, outside of a documentary? How well that would go over with today's more action oriented auidence is anybody's guess, but I've always liked that story.
I for one am eagerly awaiting the Musical Extravaganza "1787" a musical along the lines of "1776" but a bit more modern, I hear Julie Taymor's producing![]()
I agree. Hannibal is one of the most fascinating figures in history. Not to mention Fabius Maximus Cunctator and Cornelius Scipio Africanus.It would also be great to see a couple of films about the First and Second Punic Wars.
I saw The Devil's Whore with Micheal Fassbender and John Simm about that era, and it was very interesting.I for one would love to see Republican Britain on the big screen. Perhaps a big epic set during the Interregnum. (And it would be fascinating to see how Cromwell would be cast...)
Or a film depicting the Battle off Samar.I would love to see someone make a remake of Sink the Bismark, or a modern film about the Battle of Midway. I just feel with today's VFX technology, the scale and violence of these encounters could be truly realized.
Jack Palance — best Mongol ever!John Wayne was better.I thought Tony Curtis made a great mongol.
Wow, I've never heard that story, it's pretty interesting!On a more serious note, this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyatlov_Pass_incident
For a film based on a historic event to work it needs to lean towards to war, action, explody, "mannish" side of history as men are the ones who go see such movies. A slow-yet-accurate tale of someone's quiet struggle with some random-yet-powerful discovery wouldn't make for a well attended movie and would =FLOPP!
Long as it had plenty 'splosions, and the Argentinians looked like Russians or chinese, it'd fly.Face it, most of history wouldn't translate well for the vast ignorant American population who is the target audience for movies, and what little of history would translate well has to be cleaned up to a point of being palatable to what little segment would actually pay 10 bucks and spend 2 hours watching. That's the just the economics of Hollywood.
No one wants to see two countries fight over a piece of rock in the South Atlantic, not here at least.
As others have said, there's heaps, including J'Accuse and All Quiet On The Western Front, a film so powerful in its time it was banned in Germany, Italy, Australia and France - on both sides of WW1 and WW2.World War I.
Cool idea, as we know so little about it. Might be problematical as the politics were so... uhh... Byzantine.the Byzantium Empire.
I think part of the reason we don't get stuff about the Napoleonic era is that we can't really root for anybody wholeheartedly. As a fan of Hornblower, Aubrey, Sharpe etc I have a knee-jerk reaction and want to root for the British, but then I remember that they're basically fighting for an aristocratic monarchy against emerging democratic forces(albeit corrupted).
I don't recall many War of 1812 movies. Maybe it's not historical enough but I would love to see one.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.