• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Has the delay killed the hype for you?

Not for me...

It basically just means that it will most likely 2009 before we start getting real hardcore info.
 
Sort of. It's definitely delayed their marketing and PR campaign, which has softened/delayed general hype for the film. Excitement is known to transfer by osmosis, so I'm probably not as excited as I'd be if we were closer to the premiere.
 
I'm looking forward to this movie just as much as I was before. The delay isn't that big of a deal.
 
Yeah, I'm still looking forward to the movie, but my excitement level has been dialed down a bit since it was moved back. I entirely expect it to pick up though once we get closer and have official cast pictures and a full trailer.

This is how I feel as well.


Mhm, I'm with you. Kinda annoys me that we've gotta wait 5 extra months. I can understand making it a sumer blockbuster, but why not just come out and say it from the very beginning? I just hope it works.
Same here. I was a bit annoyed when they announced the delay, and it did kind of kill the excitement, but as we get closer and closer, things will really pick up again.
 
I was really enthusiastic for a while, but have more or less put my interest on hold. I am still vaguely listening for new info but not expecting any...and since the veil of secrecy descended there doesn't seem too be much point in speculating until some new news begins to filter out. I'm sure I'll be edge-of-my-seat interested after Christmas, or when the first real trailer comes out.
 
Therin, was it just the TNG movies that fell victim to that overzealous scrutiny and script leaks? I know the proliferation of the Internet made that possible on a large scale in a way that wasn't possible for the earlier Trek movies, but I was curious when that really started to happen, and if any of the later TOS movies, especially VI fell victim to this too? By the time I was a teenager in the 90s, the Internet was really becoming widely available, so I didn't get to experience this transition to spoiler heaven—it was always there for me. Having such little information about an upcoming Trek movie (or just about any anticipated movie for that matter) is a real novelty for me. :)
 
Last edited:
Although I didn't like the delay, in a way I don't mind it because it gives me time to focus on the whiz bang geek out summer that is 2008. Winter is generally a fairly 'dead' time movie-wise for me, so this year's won't be any different. I look forward to the hype that will no doubt be sprinkled everywhere starting at the end of this year into early 2009. :)
 
What Hype ?

We know next to NOTHING about the film.

Currently the only hyping going on is by fans speculating about the film.

THAT'S IT !

- W -
* Who's looking forward to the film still *
 
Don't mean to sound negative but...

Since the movie has been pushed back, I've lost interest a lot. I used to follow news sites every day. But not anymore. December 25th was like a year away back when the movie was pushed back. Now 5 months later, it's still a year away. I have lost almost all enthusiams for the movie. I hope it will come back at some point. Frankly... I'm more excited by fan productions than Trek XI at this point.

Maybe it's just me since I just haven't been lucky with things I've been looking forward to lately... namely waiting for the next AC/DC album and the game Duke Nukem Forever. ;)

Do you have similar feelings?

Somewhat for me, but a lot for the Trek franchise. This very forum has gone from 30-80 views at any one time to 10-20. It was a major blunder in my opinion. However, I am sure in 2009 we will all be back here in droves. You just don't pull the carpet out from under fans like this and have no effect though.

RAMA
 
They stand to make a good deal more money in the Summer of 2009 than at Christmas of 2008, so the decision certainly wasn't a blunder. It was the smart move.
 
What Hype ?

We know next to NOTHING about the film.

Currently the only hyping going on is by fans speculating about the film.

THAT'S IT !

- W -
* Who's looking forward to the film still *

Exactly, there IS no hype, except a bunch of people on an Internet forum arguing about the movie. Someone upthread said something about a "big to do about nothing" - there ISN'T a big to-do. All we have are a few spy shots and a teaser trailer for a teaser trailer. People are just stamping their feet because Abrams isn't doing what they want - it's like an Apple forum around here.

Personally, I'm optimistic - if they can afford to be this secretive then I think they know they have something good. We'd never get a campaign of secrecy, teasing photos and virus websites followed by the release of Nemesis.
 
Has my interest in talking about the film and my interest in news about the film waned a little because of the delay? Sure.

Will that affect my level of excitement and anticipation I will have for the film come early next year (say around March)?? No -- not in the least.

I will be just as excited about the film a month or two before its May release as I would have been a month or two prior to its original December release date if they had not decided to move it.

**************​

yes it has, but I blame the writers strike
Why would you "blame" the writer's strike?

Sure, the decision to move the release date was indirectly influenced by the writer's strike, but "blame" is an odd word to use. The decision to move the release had positive motives -- Paramount executives saw the dailies and were impressed enough to re-classify this as a "summer blockbuster-style film".

Granted, the film was moved to fill summer schedule holes left by the writers' strike, but the decision to chose Star Trek to fill that hole rather than another film was very good news for Star Trek and its fans...It means that Paramount now believes that the Star Trek could be a huge hit.

So saying that the writers' strike is to "blame" for Star Trek now being thought of as a summer blockbuster seems a little strange to me. The word "blame" has negative connotations, while the move to May 2009 was a positive one.
 
What Hype ?

We know next to NOTHING about the film.

Currently the only hyping going on is by fans speculating about the film.

THAT'S IT !

- W -
* Who's looking forward to the film still *

Exactly, there IS no hype, except a bunch of people on an Internet forum arguing about the movie. Someone upthread said something about a "big to do about nothing" - there ISN'T a big to-do. All we have are a few spy shots and a teaser trailer for a teaser trailer. People are just stamping their feet because Abrams isn't doing what they want - it's like an Apple forum around here.

Personally, I'm optimistic - if they can afford to be this secretive then I think they know they have something good. We'd never get a campaign of secrecy, teasing photos and virus websites followed by the release of Nemesis.

Ok a lot of the hype may be on the internet, but I know I am not alone in noting that we had teaser trailers, photos, chats, and set visits every darn week, and now, nothing! Its because of the release date!

RAMA
 
Hype? What hype?

There was a very, very thin buzz around this movie outside Trekkie zones. It will come bcak as we get closer.

And more money will be made in May. Win-win-win.
 
Sure, the decision to move the release date was indirectly influenced by the writer's strike, but "blame" is an odd word to use. The decision to move the release had positive motives -- Paramount executives saw the dailies and were impressed enough to re-classify this as a "summer blockbuster-style film".

This is what I'm talking about. I don't think the delay to leading the 2009 summer season is anything but positive. This is Paramount saying, "Whoa! Nice job, Abrams. How do you feel about moving to the sweet spot?"

If anything, the delay has got me more enthused but I won't start foaming at the mouth until a more revealing trailer or early 2009, whichever comes first.
 
Don't mean to sound negative but...


Do you have similar feelings?

It did not killed the hype but the hype has been paralized for me..........Maybe if JJ and Co. would start dropping us some REAL info and pics I could wiggle a toe again..........:eek:
 
Therin, was it just the TNG movies that fell victim to that overzealous scrutiny and script leaks?

During TMP's production, Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek Office fed the curiosity of ST fans through regular memos to the fan clubs, personally signed by GR, regular newsletters from Majel Barrett's Lincoln Enterprises, and Susan Sackett's monthly columns in "Starlog". We were told that "In Thy Image" was the script being used to create the movie, and that it was based on "Robot's Return" (a "Genesis II" script treatment). these scripts were eventually available from Lincoln, but I'm sure that wasn't until after TMP came out. There were lots of pics officially released to the media before the premiere, including shots of the rusted Voyager space probe at the end!

For ST II, the big expose was Susan Sackett, working under instruction from the deposed GR himself(!), when she announced the (supposedly top secret) plans for Spock's death at a big UK convention. Nick Meyer and Harve Bennett thwarted the blown plot detail by adding a faux Spock death in the Kobayashi Maru scenario at the front, and then moving the real death to the end. Originally, Spock would have died about the time of Peter Preston. Harve Bennett later said in "Starlog" that Susan unwittingly improved the film by forcing them to reshuffle events. Pics were extremely rare. A few tiny ones of the new uniforms (and Saavik!) in Japanese "Super Visual" magazine and then Starlog's "Official Movie Magazine" a week or so before the US premiere.

With ST III, a bootleg copy of Harve Bennett's "Return to Genesis" script proposal was mass-produced - and sold at huge prices at big ST conventions in the US. It had Spock as a vampiric figure appearing in people's mirrors on the Enterprise! And a crew of Romulans on their Bird of Prey. Luckily, a lot was changed before the final version, which was kept pretty secret until the premiere. (The most raw footage we saw was a few months earlier, when the sets caught alight and Shatner posed for camera with a fire extinguisher.)

I was very lucky to buy some auctioned ST III call sheets in New York (a Creation convention) in January 1984, long before the US premiere! They revealed that an actor called "Frank Force" was playing a character called "Nacluv". The character's number was quite high, meaning he was introduced very late in the movie. (Of course, someone I knew from the set pointed out that "Nacluv" was "Vulcan" spelt backwards, and he was played by "the frankest force in the galaxy".) In the final credits, note that "Frank Force" is the Excelsior elevator voice! I also had morning tea with Grace Lee Whitney in LA a few weeks later and I accidentally found out she'd just done her Spacedock cafeteria cameo, filmed at ILM!

ST IV was also pretty secretive. Copying the ST III bootleg idea, a guy called John Flynn (who'd circulated a "Star Wars" script he'd tried submitting to Lucas) had written a phony proposal called "The Trial of James T Kirk", and it sold very well, but it was an obvious phony - from the sheer number of TOS guest artists it required.

There were many rumours of "whales and dolphins" being in the real film - and we knew that Eddie Murphy's role as a journalist type had been rewritten for a female marine biologist. The most intriguing "news" was "Entertainment Tonight" featuring the exciting filming of the Klingon vessel in Paramount's flooded carpark/"B" Tank, where Esther Williams once played a mermaid! My penpal drew me storyboards of everything she saw on her TV. (We eventually got the footage in Oz as "Entertainment This Week".) So we knew the crew went back in time, but most of us assumed the ship crashed into the bay when arriving in the 20th century! We couldn't think of how they would ever get back, esp. not with whales aboard!

There was definitely enough "news" to put a "sealed section" in my clubs newsletter!

With ST V, Roddenberry again got into a public sparring match, saying that Sybok was a bad idea. But again, there were not really any majorly leaked scripts. by this time, all scripts were hand numbered - in huge numerals through every page!

With ST VI, we knew there was a link with "Unification", and eventually someone put together several sets of numbered bootlegged pages to create a whole script - with Saavik's name in the place of Valeris. But it didn't get wide release until the movie premiered.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top