Well, he's not really gay, you know.
Then how do you explain George Takei at the Denver Star Trek convention in 1990 telling me and a crowd of 3000+ that GR had told him during production of TOS that Sulu's name was on paper as being 'Hikaru'? I'll take GR over Vonda McIntyre and William Rostler any day. It was his baby.
Well, it's obvious with this type of discrepancy, both of you should be immediately destroyed.
Well, it's obvious with this type of discrepancy, both of you should be immediately destroyed.
Nah, it must be settled in the traditional Vulcan way!
Koon-ut-kal-if-fee!!!
"Bring fort... de ahn-woon!"
Ah Celia Lovsky, God bless you.![]()
Except Vonda McIntyre got the name Hikaru from the series bible written by Gene Roddenberry.
"Penda" was agreed to by Nichols when she was approached by a group of fans in the 70s. She also agreed to "Nyota", when approached by William Rotsler. It's not moot because both Rotsler and Nichols have discussed it in "Starlog" interviews.Not to mention the same series bible said that Uhura's first name is Penda, not Nyota, so getting Nichelle's approval is moot.
Then how do you explain George Takei at the Denver Star Trek convention in 1990 telling me and a crowd of 3000+ that GR had told him during production of TOS that Sulu's name was on paper as being 'Hikaru'? I'll take GR over Vonda McIntyre and William Rostler any day. It was his baby.
Logical.So, Nyota Penda Uhura and Hikaru Walter Sulu?![]()
I can't quote a source, but I seem to recall Uhura's name being suggested as Upenda, but I could be entirely wrong.
As to brother George, a strange thought occurred to me the other night.
What if the child born to the Kirk's was in fact their first, and only child. And under the extreme duress of the Narada's attack, he is named Jim instead of George. This would explain the change in eye color for one thing.
So it just so happens that we are watching the adventures of Captain George Samuel Kirk, who in this timeline has no younger brother, no wife and child, and just happens to have been named James T. due to a sudden change in the timeline?!?
Eh? Whadya think?
Emphasis mine
Also, remember, Spock Prime recognized Kirk on sight. We see a different actor, but in-universe, Kirk still looks exactly the same as he did before (and so do Scotty, whom Spock Prime also recognized on sight, and Spock himself, whose biometrics were recognized by the Vulcan ship's computer). So it's the same individual genetically. It's not his older brother. (And yes, I'm aware that "Sam" in "Operation: Annihilate" was just Shatner with a moustache and grey temples. But I don't think that was meant to be taken with slavish literalness any more than the recasting of the actors in this movie is meant to be taken as a literal change in appearance.)
Well, it's obvious with this type of discrepancy, both of you should be immediately destroyed.
Nah, it must be settled in the traditional Vulcan way!
Koon-ut-kal-if-fee!!!
"Bring fort... de ahn-woon!"
Ah Celia Lovsky, God bless you.![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX3KsHDZ1sE
That kid on the highway is Sam Kirk. Alan Dean Foster's novelisation confirms this.
I can't quote a source, but I seem to recall Uhura's name being suggested as Upenda, but I could be entirely wrong.
Judging by how old his parents were shown to be when he was born, and the age difference between he and his brother depicted in TOS, His parent would have been in their very early teens when they had George. It does raise a question about this film beginning in the Original Timeline, since the math just doesn't add up when you think about it. Bottom line, for the purposes of this film, I vote chucked.
Goddamn it, I like that--though it does lead to some questions regarding his age...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.