Re: Give me an F, give me an I, give me a R, give me an E, give me a D
she's hot.
she's hot.

2) Or by viewing magazines that adults should have made sure they weren't viewing.
2) Or by viewing magazines that adults should have made sure they weren't viewing.
And we know that children are just so great about doing what their parents say and not getting a hold of contraband!
2) Or by viewing magazines that adults should have made sure they weren't viewing.
And we know that children are just so great about doing what their parents say and not getting a hold of contraband!
The fault still lies with the parents not with the models who pose for the photos.
I also hope that the cheerleading squad poses for Playboy en masse to show their solidarity. As soon as they turn eighteen, of course.
I would be 100% more interested about how well a teacher taught than whether or not she posed for Playboy. I don't consider Playboy to be pornographic, and I don't consider nudity in itself to be a bad thing so I cannot see what harm she has actually done to anyone.
How is it undermining her teaching? She keeps her clothes on while teaching and that is all that should matter.
It's not like teachers don't already go into as much debt as every other university student but take much longer to pay it off because the only jobs their degrees are any good for have shitty pay and benefits, just so they can work long hours and be treated like babysitters instead of teachers.
It does, however, reflect on the IMAGE of her job and thus on the integrity and image of the school. Would you want YOUR child's teacher to be an Playboy?
I dot see any reason why I should care. There is nothing wrong or immoral about nudity. Why are so many people convinced that there is?It does, however, reflect on the IMAGE of her job and thus on the integrity and image of the school. Would you want YOUR child's teacher to be an Playboy?
And we know that children are just so great about doing what their parents say and not getting a hold of contraband!
The fault still lies with the parents not with the models who pose for the photos.
Parents can't keep an eye on or control their children 24/7. Teenagers especially are known for flouting rules. And it's not her fault that the kids SAW the pictures but it is her fault for undermining her authority and the school's integrity and image for posing for the pictures.
These pictures did not undermine anything. They are just pictures. If some teens saw some pictures of a naked lady it is no big deal. They have been doing that for generations.Parents can't keep an eye on or control their children 24/7. Teenagers especially are known for flouting rules. And it's not her fault that the kids SAW the pictures but it is her fault for undermining her authority and the school's integrity and image for posing for the pictures.
She did no such thing. The contract mentions degrading behavior. Posing nude is not degrading.She did however break her contract, the school made the right decision.
Responsible parents can do so. Children need limits and don't realize that they expect them. People like you, who say, "Oh, the kids are going to smoke, drink, and have sex anyway" are the ones who cause these problems.
I need to go back to school ...
She did no such thing. The contract mentions degrading behavior. Posing nude is not degrading.[/QUOTE]She did however break her contract, the school made the right decision.
They get much more vacation time than most other professions, though. That's a huge plus.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.