• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

GI Joe 2

General's Joes had an interview last night with someone who saw the test screening:

http://generalsjoes.com/2012/05/27/g-i-joe-retaliation-screening-report-from-kern-radio/#more-15106

Did Tatum [. . .] pose a problem for you?
Caller X: The questionnaire after the movie asks about the character, if we wanted to see more. (We knew this already.) He said that added Tatum would probably be better because of the chemistry between hm and Roadblock and that the character was developed in the first movie. He mentions Jinx as having no character arc at all and Flint as being portrayed as a jerky kind of guy, but there is no character development on him at all. Joe Colton 3-4 scenes, these felt like a reshoot already. The scenes are decent but feel like and after thought. Something just added on.
And Variety is reporting that Hasbro has recalled the toy line for Retaliation:

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118054684

With Paramount moving the actioner from June 29 to March 29, 2013, to give it more muscle at the box office with 3D, retailers are being asked to send back the line of Hasbro toys that were starting to appear on shelves.
 
General's Joes had an interview last night with someone who saw the test screening:

http://generalsjoes.com/2012/05/27/g-i-joe-retaliation-screening-report-from-kern-radio/#more-15106
There are some major spoilers here. I wouldn't click on this link if you don't want to be spoiled.

Yeah . . . but I'm willing to bet most of those spoilers aren't worth beans when the movie finally gets to theaters. That is a major part of the speculation surrounding the delay in release, that
they will add more Channing Tatum scenes and have him be a part of the whole movie instead of "dying" at the beginning. Also, based on other accounts it seems as though Duke's death is ambiguous anyhow since he reportedly runs behind a vehicle that gets blown up and we never see a body. Reminds me of the Rex "death" sequence in the first one.
 
And Variety is reporting that Hasbro has recalled the toy line for Retaliation:

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118054684

With Paramount moving the actioner from June 29 to March 29, 2013, to give it more muscle at the box office with 3D, retailers are being asked to send back the line of Hasbro toys that were starting to appear on shelves.


Variety are talking out of their bungholes. the toys are on sale: Hasbro issued a statement saying what's already been shipped will remain on sale and that's it until March for new Joe toys.
 
The article is kind of weird because in one sentence they state that Hasbro is recalling all the merch but the Hasbro quote they use is more in line with your post. Par for shoddy internet reporting and editing, I guess.
 
How could a film with trailers as good as this one with a mandage from and by the director to fix the first film's problems be so messed up?
 
The reshoots will just be a few scenes with Raymond Burr* talking to the backs of the Rock and Adrianne Palicki's heads.

*(CGI Raymond Burr for all you "he's been dead for 20 years" smart alecks.)
 
Big Bad Toy Store are still selling the toy line. This kind of reminds me of what happened with "Cabin in The Woods". It was originally pushed back because the studio wanted to convert it to 3D. I don't buy that excuse...it surprises me that they did this.
 
Dwayne has several other projects on the go right now and there has been no discussion about his return to the WWE as far as I know.
 
General's Joes had an interview last night with someone who saw the test screening:

http://generalsjoes.com/2012/05/27/g-i-joe-retaliation-screening-report-from-kern-radio/#more-15106
There are some major spoilers here. I wouldn't click on this link if you don't want to be spoiled.

Yeah . . . but I'm willing to bet most of those spoilers aren't worth beans when the movie finally gets to theaters. That is a major part of the speculation surrounding the delay in release, that
they will add more Channing Tatum scenes and have him be a part of the whole movie instead of "dying" at the beginning. Also, based on other accounts it seems as though Duke's death is ambiguous anyhow since he reportedly runs behind a vehicle that gets blown up and we never see a body. Reminds me of the Rex "death" sequence in the first one.

That they'll probably do is have leave the beginning of the movie alone and add some scenes at the end where they discover and rescue Duke. Tatum might not be the best actor, but for most of the audience, Duke is G.I. Joe. Doing what they originally had planned to do would have been like Bay killing of Optimus Prime permanently in ROTF. You lose your audience. A perceived death of the central character makes a good plot point, you have to bring them back at the end to keep your audience.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top