The non-canonical comic book confirms Lorca's statements. Remember that liberal and reformist on MU terms.
I shudder to think about the existence of a Terran Emperor worse than Georgiou.
The non-canonical comic book confirms Lorca's statements. Remember that liberal and reformist on MU terms.
I do not recommend reading any MU books then.I shudder to think about the existence of a Terran Emperor worse than Georgiou.
If the potential series is "under development" then they're not nearly to the point where they would be making a pilot.They might just be doing a pilot
I meant one of those pilots they pitch to the studio, not one the audience sees.If the potential series is "under development" then they're not nearly to the point where they would be making a pilot.
It could be a good show. My big concern is it’s going to be like “24 in space” with a message that “Empathy is weakness when security is at stake”. Which is the exact opposite of the point of Trek and exact opposite of message we need right now.
They're giving the cannibal queen Georgiou her own series. Kewl?
She ate Kelpians. While not technically cannibalism, please explain to me how it's not exactly as horrific.How is She a canabal?
She ate Kelpians. While not technically cannibalism, please explain to me how it's not exactly as horrific.
How is it in any way less morally wrong?Guess it depends how nice they taste?
Not even remotely canablism though as it needs to be same species.
I would suggest that from Georgiou's perspective that Kelpian's view of themselves as a prey animal and therefore "fair game" as food is relivant from a moral and ethical standpoint.
Can we judge all cultures on a universal morality? If so, what is that universal standard and the source of moral certitude?Huh, that's an interesting take on it. Individual objections aside (Saru), if Kelpian culture as a whole accepts their role as food, as indeed the Short Trek shows, then it would be insulting to Kelpian culture not to eat them, indeed it would be a form of cultural imperialism to try and stop it. From a certain point of view.
How is it in any way less morally wrong?
This could be interesting.You should show a divided starfleet that's not sure itself with some realist admirals knowing they are in effect a military but with limits, hippy deluded admirals who think it isn't and everything is roses and sunshine despite fighting a war and those allied with S31 (like Cartwright from undiscovered country) who are militaristic and would if able go off the deep end.
This could be interesting.
I think they only see themselves as food for the predator species of their home planet.Huh, that's an interesting take on it. Individual objections aside (Saru), if Kelpian culture as a whole accepts their role as food, as indeed the Short Trek shows, then it would be insulting to Kelpian culture not to eat them, indeed it would be a form of cultural imperialism to try and stop it. From a certain point of view.
Interestingly enough, it is not clear if the Ba'ul, the prey species, is from the same planet.I think they only see themselves as food for the predator species of their home planet.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.