• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Gene Roddenberry: Sinner or Saint?

Gene Roddenberry: Sinner or Saint?

  • Sinner

    Votes: 25 73.5%
  • Saint

    Votes: 9 26.5%

  • Total voters
    34
  • Poll closed .
We should not attack Roddenberry for his vices, whatever they may have been. In the end, we are no better. We are just as human and frasil and imperfect as he was. But he did have one heck of a vision and he shared it with us despite knowing his own vices would be brought up by those with limited imaginations.
That's absurd.
 
I disagree. A person shouldn't just be judged by what they left behind but also should be judged on how they treated others while they were here. YMMV.
Hey, since it's Christmas: "He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone..."

No one is perfect. But I've never disrespected my wife by cheating on her nor did I ever steal from former co-workers to advance my position in life.

Guess I'm just weird...
I guess you disagree with the Jesus then, huh? ;)
 
Grace Lee vehemently denies even having been involved with Gene in both her memoir. In fact, she jokes if she had given into his advances she might've been on the show for it's full run.

I've had that book for years -- I need to finally give it a read. Was it written before or after the Solow/Justman book (since that book definitely suggests a relationship)?

I still think it isn't a stretch to say that he was a dick to his first wife, though. The fact that she was able to sue him (and win) for profits from Star Trek which he pretended didn't exist doesn't paint Gene Roddenberry in the best of light. Having said that, I still don't think the OP's question is of much interest, really.
 
Hey, since it's Christmas: "He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone..."

No one is perfect. But I've never disrespected my wife by cheating on her nor did I ever steal from former co-workers to advance my position in life.

Guess I'm just weird...
I guess you disagree with the Jesus then, huh? ;)

Well, since I'm not a Christian I'm not sure it matters whether I agree with him or not. I'm simply holding Roddenberry to his own standard of treating people with basic respect.

Or...

Say you have a child who creates a popular entertainment vehicle. Would you be proud of that child if you knew that they cheated, stole and disrespected people on his/her way there and continued to do the same things long after he/she became rich and famous? That's the most damning thing about Roddenberry, not the indiscretions of youth... but the fact that he continued those practices all the way until the end.
 
Who cares whether Shatner or Roddenberry or whoever has been involved in Trek has been a nice guy or not, all that matters is their work.
 
Who cares whether Shatner or Roddenberry or whoever has been involved in Trek has been a nice guy or not, all that matters is their work.

I'm sure there are many pastors, priests, politicians, school teachers and athletes that wished the public was so forgiving of their transgressions. :shrug:
 
Not letting this go anytime soon huh?

I think it's an interesting discussion on how we view our heroes in general. I'm obviously in the minority based on the posts here, but it doesn't necessarily make me wrong. :techman:
 
We're all quite aware how human and fallable the actors are, I don't think many people here view any of them as "heroes".
 
Who cares whether Shatner or Roddenberry or whoever has been involved in Trek has been a nice guy or not, all that matters is their work.

I'm sure there are many pastors, priests, politicians, school teachers and athletes that wished the public was so forgiving of their transgressions. :shrug:
I am neither condemning not forgiving as I view the work of people involved in Trek as far more relevant than how well they have treated their subordinates or co-workers. Has Shatner been a jerk when he wrote something like the 'Scott bumps his head' scene in TFF? Perhaps but I liked the scene.
Take all the people who got a moral erection when Christian Bale, the most committed method actor that currently lives, has become rude and loud on a set once. Why should I care about this, I have not been present so I cannot judge whether his behaviour was justified or not. All I care about is how well this guy acts when I buy a theatre ticket.
 
Why should I care about this, I have not been present so I cannot judge whether his behaviour was justified or not. All I care about is how well this guy acts when I buy a theatre ticket.

See. I think this drives their sense of entitlement to do as they please.

Plus, in the case of Bale, we're talking about a one-time incident.
 
In my eyes nobody is entitled to do as he or she pleases and in my eyes I am not entitled to be the judge of ordinary human weakneses in the case of a famous person.
You can't become a CEO or a politician or reach a position with some influences if you have always behaved flawlessly. If somebody fights successfuly against climate change but drives a Porsche I will not focus on the latter. Being correct in small but corrupt in big matters is too petty bourgeois for me, I prefer it the other way around.

Back to the original question, has Roddenberry behaved flawlessly? Certainly not. Has he mistreated and exploited colleagues? Yes. Does this invalidate his vision? Not in the least. Trek is Trek no matter how wicked or virtuous The Rodd has been.
 
^The OP asked whether or not the quality of his creation should elevate GR to sainthood, or is he a sinner because of his personal and professional "transgressions". I say neither. He was human. I'd say the same of anyone.

Except Spielberg. That guy's awesome.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top