My take on it was that they were trying to convince her that pursuing the Throne is foolish and will end in the destruction of the Red Keep and likely King's Landing itself. I think they were trying to show her a possible future where she sees her destruction. I don't think they were trying to keep her in that vision. That was what Drogo's vision was for, I think.I loved everything in the episode but the first vision the warlock showed to Dany. If he was trying to tempt her to stay in one of the illusions so as to maintain his power wouldnt a throne room full of devoted and fearful subjects have been better than an empty and destroyed throne room? Yes that one scene was my only quibble. Completely enjoyed the rest of the episode.Now the long wait until next season.
No, the "why" is completely different, and pretty much removes any reason to sympathize with him.And as far as Robb's storyline, they haven't changed anything other than the name and location of where his now-wife is from.
Not disagreeing with you in the slightest. That's not to say others won't, though. Just sayin'...Nothing in there is a spoiler. The season's over, the show has definitively diverged from it. It'd be a spoiler if that occurred prior to the finale (ie, the marriage), but there's nothing there about Season 3 or the third book (well, technically, all of this is from the third book, but the show moved it to book two).
The second season finale of HBO’s Game Of Thrones last night drew a series high 4.2 million viewers at 9 PM, up 38% from the first season closer 3 million. With an additional 910,000 viewers tuning in for the 11:10 PM replay, the combined gross audience for the night was 5.1 million viewers. For the season, GOT has an average gross audience of 10.4 million viewers per episode, including linear, on-demand and DVR play. The GOT finale also lifted HBO’s new comedies. Veep (1.2 million viewers at 10:10 PM) had its second most watched episode, while Girls (1.1 million at 10:40 PM) hit a series high.
Something tells me Season Three's going to get another budget increase.
Nothing in there is a spoiler. The season's over, the show has definitively diverged from it. It'd be a spoiler if that occurred prior to the finale (ie, the marriage), but there's nothing there about Season 3 or the third book (well, technically, all of this is from the third book, but the show moved it to book two).
And for the last time this season, we're going to keep the book/spoiler issue as simple as possible. We are here to discuss "Game of Thrones" AS A TV SHOW, NOT AS AN ENDLESS SERIES OF COMPARISONS TO THE BOOKS. Therefore, here's the only rule you should remember: if your comment contains the phrase "the books" without it being immediately preceded by "I haven't read," then you should probably delete what you've written and start over. Anything even vaguely questionable will be deleted, and if you see something that I haven't already removed, please feel free to email me. As usual, I've set up a message board discussion thread where you can do as much TV vs. books discussion as you want. In these comments, everything book-related that has yet to come up on the TV show (plot, characters we haven't met, motivation, etc.) is verboten.
I'm glad they're taking into account second-viewings, online and DVR playback in addition to first-run's. I've always found the old Nielson model an extremely cumbersome, inaccurate and archaic method of tracking such things.
I was really impressed with the scene in the House of the Undying; I was not expecting the dragons to be quite so potent. That being said, I have a feeling that that illusion of the throne room in King's Landing is foreshadowing for the future (I haven't read the books yet so don't tell me).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.