• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Game of Thrones 2.10 - "Valar Morghulis" - Rate and discuss

Grading


  • Total voters
    56
Yes, her literally two seconds of happines before Littlefinger ruined it. Her reaction and his speech to her is what made me fearful for her character through much of book 3.

Really excellent way to wrap up the season. I loved how it ended. I was rooting for Sam the Slayer to make an appearance but damn, those White Walkers were scary as hell. I didn't notice any female ones, either. Just male Wildings and Night's Watch. Craester really is sending his sons as a sacrifice?

The House of the Undying was a good change from the books that works well on TV. Great surprise to see the Iron Throne covered in snow and then Dany leaving via the gate at the Wall to meet Drogo. And I love me some dragons. Those things look really cool.

I only have a couple of grumbles and I consider them to be small. Ros, I was really hoping she'd get killed but she'll be back. Oh well. And I think they rushed Jon's stuff too much but it did what it had to do and tied it to the end of the book. Although I did enjoy Ygritte smacking him in the head with his own sword.

And as far as Robb's storyline, they haven't changed anything other than the name and location of where his now-wife is from. Robb's not a POV character in the books so they could take some liberty as to what happened although he did tell Cat.

Is it April 2013 yet?
 
I loved everything in the episode but the first vision the warlock showed to Dany. If he was trying to tempt her to stay in one of the illusions so as to maintain his power wouldnt a throne room full of devoted and fearful subjects have been better than an empty and destroyed throne room? Yes that one scene was my only quibble. Completely enjoyed the rest of the episode.Now the long wait until next season.
My take on it was that they were trying to convince her that pursuing the Throne is foolish and will end in the destruction of the Red Keep and likely King's Landing itself. I think they were trying to show her a possible future where she sees her destruction. I don't think they were trying to keep her in that vision. That was what Drogo's vision was for, I think.
 
Excellent Excellent Ender. Wrapped up a few story lines, set the table up for next year. Didn't have the 'wow' factor like Blackwater, but didn't expect it too at all.

Some highlights:

Dragons
White Walkers
Faceless man
 
It seems the same to me. This isn't the type of show where you should expect main characters to make logical and rational decisions all the time. You can't expect Robb Stark, a teenager thrust into war after the death of his father and the betrayal of Theon, to ignore his heart because of an oath to marry someone he has never met for a bridge.
 
In the book, he learned that his brothers had been killed (supposedly), and in a moment of despair he slept with a girl and took her virginity. Having already done that, as he saw it, he could either:

1) Leave her a "ruined" woman.
2) Marry her and risk the breakup of his alliance.

In keeping with his father's behaviour, he chose the latter. It was a difficult choice in the aftermath of an understandable mistake.

In the show, he just decided that he can brazenly go back on his word to allies who have committed thousands of soldiers to his cause and risked death for him just because he feels like it. It's utterly unsympathetic. Not to mention that he does this after the Lannister-Tyrell alliance and the defeat of Stannis, which at least doubles the enemy forces he's facing.
 
^^^ Aw snap! Y'better put book references in spoiler code. Some people have been driven to apoplexy around here from book "spoilers". Even though they aren't...

And yes - loved this finale. Everything rocked.
 
Nothing in there is a spoiler. The season's over, the show has definitively diverged from it. It'd be a spoiler if that occurred prior to the finale (ie, the marriage), but there's nothing there about Season 3 or the third book (well, technically, all of this is from the third book, but the show moved it to book two).
 
Nothing in there is a spoiler. The season's over, the show has definitively diverged from it. It'd be a spoiler if that occurred prior to the finale (ie, the marriage), but there's nothing there about Season 3 or the third book (well, technically, all of this is from the third book, but the show moved it to book two).
Not disagreeing with you in the slightest. That's not to say others won't, though. Just sayin'...
 
I'll agree that it would have worked better if Robb had received a message about his brothers' "deaths" before sleeping with Talisa, but I think it still works as portrayed on screen. The man may not have lost his brothers, but losing a father and waging a war isn't something you just shrug off.
 
Ratings for the finale are in:

http://www.deadline.com/2012/06/game-of-threones-hits-series-high-in-season-finale/

The second season finale of HBO’s Game Of Thrones last night drew a series high 4.2 million viewers at 9 PM, up 38% from the first season closer 3 million. With an additional 910,000 viewers tuning in for the 11:10 PM replay, the combined gross audience for the night was 5.1 million viewers. For the season, GOT has an average gross audience of 10.4 million viewers per episode, including linear, on-demand and DVR play. The GOT finale also lifted HBO’s new comedies. Veep (1.2 million viewers at 10:10 PM) had its second most watched episode, while Girls (1.1 million at 10:40 PM) hit a series high.
 
^^^ They would be foolish not to.

I'm glad they're taking into account second-viewings, online and DVR playback in addition to first-run's. I've always found the old Nielson model an extremely cumbersome, inaccurate and archaic method of tracking such things.
 
Something tells me Season Three's going to get another budget increase.

It'll have to!

Great finale! How the fuck are we supposed to wait a whole other year? Argh!

I hope they'll at least bring out the DVDs before bloody March this time...

Ah well, at least I've got the season 2 soundtrack to be listening to...
 
Nothing in there is a spoiler. The season's over, the show has definitively diverged from it. It'd be a spoiler if that occurred prior to the finale (ie, the marriage), but there's nothing there about Season 3 or the third book (well, technically, all of this is from the third book, but the show moved it to book two).


I know there's *no* sympathy for my point of view, and I read the books between season 2 and 3 so I'm not complaining for myself, but...

People should be able to discuss an episode of a television show without learning things from the book. This show might cause people to read the books, and you're giving them information that they wouldn't otherwise have.

That's not to say the info details you gave were vital, or damaging to the story in any real way, and I think people really have been much better in the threads this season than last, but it's worth pointing that out.

I say this because I know that if I had not read the books my experiences from the season 1 threads would have kept me from reading them this season, and that's not fair. There's a thread for spoilers, and maybe that's where comparisons between the show and the books should take place.

Anyone who does feel that way should probably seek out somewhere like Alan Sepinwall's blog, where he puts this warning at the end of every review (and still has to regularly delete comments that go over the line):

And for the last time this season, we're going to keep the book/spoiler issue as simple as possible. We are here to discuss "Game of Thrones" AS A TV SHOW, NOT AS AN ENDLESS SERIES OF COMPARISONS TO THE BOOKS. Therefore, here's the only rule you should remember: if your comment contains the phrase "the books" without it being immediately preceded by "I haven't read," then you should probably delete what you've written and start over. Anything even vaguely questionable will be deleted, and if you see something that I haven't already removed, please feel free to email me. As usual, I've set up a message board discussion thread where you can do as much TV vs. books discussion as you want. In these comments, everything book-related that has yet to come up on the TV show (plot, characters we haven't met, motivation, etc.) is verboten.

Anyways, don't mean to be a dick, don't want a fight, but I think it's a reasonable position.

I'm glad they're taking into account second-viewings, online and DVR playback in addition to first-run's. I've always found the old Nielson model an extremely cumbersome, inaccurate and archaic method of tracking such things.

It's a lot easier for HBO to do that, because they're not worried about ad revenue from people viewing commercials.
 
I was really impressed with the scene in the House of the Undying; I was not expecting the dragons to be quite so potent. That being said, I have a feeling that that illusion of the throne room in King's Landing is foreshadowing for the future (I haven't read the books yet so don't tell me).

Yea, you have these tiny little dragons and then look at the damage they do? I was wondering how it would play out... but remember what they said at Harrenhall and dragon fire? Dragon-fire is not the same as normal fire. A normal fire wouldn't have melted stone that way. So I'm guessing even though the dragons are small and their output isn't very high the fact that it is dragon-fire is what is the difference maker.
 
Well, if one grown dragon can torch a whole castle (or village), it's not too far gone that it takes all three babies to set a wizard on fire.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top