- Dany kept her clothes on for an entire season!
- Ros kept her clothes on for almost an entire season!.
![]()
While I'm okay with the second, the first could take some fixing...

- Dany kept her clothes on for an entire season!
- Ros kept her clothes on for almost an entire season!.
![]()
I don't think it'll take 2 full seasons. It's a big book, but not that big. The fourth season will probably already have parts of 4th and 5th books (which take place at the same time).Is everyone still thinking the 3rd book will take 2 seasons to do?
I agree, they'll probably need 1 1/2 seasons for book 3 and 1 1/2 seasons for books 4 and 5, there's so much padding in the last two books that it will be easy to cut them down.I don't think it'll take 2 full seasons. It's a big book, but not that big. The fourth season will probably already have parts of 4th and 5th books (which take place at the same time).Is everyone still thinking the 3rd book will take 2 seasons to do?
In that case they could have extended more of the season 2 plotlines, Renly's death or Theon taking Winterfell could have served as a season finale, but they didn't do that. That's why I assume they won't stretch the series out more than they have to, it is very successful but it's also very expensive and it won't get cheaper over time.Unless HBO doesn't want to cut that padding down. The series is, after all, one of their biggest hits of all time. If it continues to be as popular as it has been, I would be very surprised if they condense the books like that.
It's been confirmed that season three will cover the first half of A Storm of Swords, to wit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_of_Thrones_(season_3)I don't think it'll take 2 full seasons. It's a big book, but not that big. The fourth season will probably already have parts of 4th and 5th books (which take place at the same time).Is everyone still thinking the 3rd book will take 2 seasons to do?
You realize you're agreeing with the statement that the best seasons are most of the time not after the fifth, right? Even if DS9 is the exception, that's still only one show and doesn't disprove the argument that almost every long running show is better in its early seasons.List me five movie/tv/book series where the 3rd is generally considered the best if you're going to try using that. Amongst big ASOIAF fans I bet you I could find just as many who like the first or second books best. Personally I would lean towards the third being the most compelling, but the first two are far superior on the editing front. In general, especially in TV and movies, the first or second film/season is generally the best IMO. Battlestar, Dexter, Star Wars, and I could go on.
Well, that's just common sense, no one in their right mind would do them separately. It was a big mistake when Martin did it, so why would they repeat that?I'm also pretty sure I read somewhere that Weiss and Beinoff, the showrunners, would combine A Feast for Crows and Dance With Dragons rather then doing them seperately.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.