Such as?Three hours in and we really haven’t covered much ground. I going ask you all who have read the books, is there a reason the plot is going this slowly? Is there some good stuff coming up?
I am so curious how viewers are going to respond to that.I'm assuming / hoping they put the brakes on these time jumps once Emma D’Arcy takes over.
I'm looking forward to seeing the cast take their final form, but I was an instant fan of Alcock - great actress with loads of charisma. So while I have mixed feelings about the switch, I don't think they've put a foot wrong with any of the casting so far.I am so curious how viewers are going to respond to that.
Three hours in and we really haven’t covered much ground. I’m going ask you all who have read the books, is there a reason the plot is going this slowly? Is there some good stuff coming up?
Having totally lost track of the literary side, I didn't know this was based on a book.
Essentially a Westerosi Silmarillion but with more drawings.It is and it isn't.
The basic timline of The Dance of Dragons was originally outlined in a chapter of Martin's book The World of Ice and Fire, and then expanded in Fire and Blood. However, both books are written as if they're authored by historians within the universe. They are not novels, they are semi-dry textbook accounts.
Thus the "what" is pretty well established as a basic plot outline. However, the author within universe relies upon three biased sources for his own history (a septon, a maester, and a jester), and has his own biases, so it's very much an "unreliable narrator" kinda situation.
The time jumps really hurts the show IMO. The entire Crabfeeder story is meh because we know nothing about him really.
They've talked about the older actors wearing some aging makeup, so we must be jumping ahead some decades to heavy action scenes. I think we'll be getting an entirely new story next year.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.