And the ship looks better than ever before
But there's one very odd mistake![]()
Sometimes the artists didn't have reference, or sometimes they just chose to go another way with it. Gray Morrow's Enterprise interiors never looked much like what you saw on the show or movies, but it was all drawn so beautifully you didn't care.What was the deal with the Enterprise and Excelsior bridges in DC's first Trek run? Occasionally they'd resemble the Enterprise movie sets but far more often they were large, rectangular spaces with unique turbolift access and circuits and controls spamming every surface.
What was the deal with the Enterprise and Excelsior bridges in DC's first Trek run? Occasionally they'd resemble the Enterprise movie sets but far more often they were large, rectangular spaces with unique turbolift access and circuits and controls spamming every surface.
I think if you want subtlety, a Mirror Universe story is the wrong place to go looking for it.LOL, the "SS" insignia on the Romulan's helmet. Sublety is all...![]()
Speaking from experience, licensors these days are far more fussy about the artwork, and wouldn't approve art that diverted as much as Sutton's did. I mention this only to make it clear that it's not entirely on the artists........I love Tom Sutton's take on the Star Trek universe, though I think it's more United Planets (ie., the Legion of Super-Heroes) than United Federation of Planets. He's not a likeness artist, so his characters only vaguely resemble the actors -- but they're recognizable as the characters they're supposed to be. His technology looks wildly different than the Star Trek norm, and that's kind of the charm of it. Sutton suggests the idea of Star Trek without being slavishly devoted it, which is refreshing when compared to licensed comics today that are so busy matching likenesses and look that they forget to have a personality of their own.
DC was helped by the fact that they had the rights to use all of Star Trek. Marvel's contract limited them to only use elements that had appeared in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. They snuck in a few TV elements, though, like Kirk's service on the Republic.There was a humanity to DC’s work that I really liked. Marvel dropped the ball. Normally it was Marvel that was more mature an DC more goofy…for awhile.
And two appearances from Admiral Fitzpatrick from "The Trouble with Tribbles" (in issues #4 and #6).DC was helped by the fact that they had the rights to use all of Star Trek. Marvel's contract limited them to only use elements that had appeared in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. They snuck in a few TV elements, though, like Kirk's service on the Republic.
- Issue #4 & 6: Admiral Fitzpatrick (from "The Trouble With Tribbles")
- #5: Klingon mind-sifter
- #6: Ensign Kirk's service on the Republic (though the story contradicts what "Obsession" established about the Farragut being Kirk's first deep-space assignment); pilot-era uniforms
- #8: Mr. Kyle
- #8 & 13: Klingon stasis weapon (from "More Tribbles, More Troubles") -- only referenced in #8 but actually used in #13
- #8, 10, 17: the Prime Directive
- #9: A TOS-style USS Endeavor; pilot-era uniforms; "transtater" [sic] as basis of Starfleet tech
- #11: Mr. DeSalle; Berthold rays and a reference to Omicron Ceti; mentions of Carolyn Palamas and Mira Romaine
- #12: Galactic barrier and references to the Valiant and Enterprise encountering it; discussion of Kirk/Rand romantic tension; a Class J cargo ship; "Jeffries tube" [sic]; Elba II referenced
- #13: Joanna McCoy, and a reference to her time as a nurse on Cerberus ("The Survivor"); the Organian Peace Treaty; pergium; "pon far" [sic] and its 7-year cycle; engines in "red zone proximity" with four hours to blow ("The Savage Curtain"); choriocytosis and strobolin ("The Pirates of Orion")
- #14: "Class M" planet; Hodgkins' Law of Parallel Planetary Development
- #14, 15: cordrazine
- #14, 16: neutronium
- #15: cloaking device; Antosians and their metamorphic abilities ("Whom Gods Destroy"); Argan sur-snake ("The Ambergris Element"); the Vulcan inner eyelid ("Operation: Annihilate"); alternative terms for mind-meld such as "mind-touch" and "mind-fusion"
- #16: Matter transmuters reminiscent of those from "Catspaw"
- #17: tritanium
I'll never understand the precise limits of these licences. I recall reading a Trek videogame writer wasn't allowed Klingons in a a 90's pitch because they were part of "the Next Gen license" and they had Voyager - despite a Voyager character being half-Klingon!
I'll never understand the precise limits of these licences. I recall reading a Trek videogame writer wasn't allowed Klingons in a a 90's pitch because they were part of "the Next Gen license" and they had Voyager - despite a Voyager character being half-Klingon!
Sometimes companies will only pay for limited rights by way of reducing costs, so for example one licensor could only have a Voyager license, which means they can only do stuff that's particular to that show. That would explain the Klingon Empire and Klingon characters being off-limits.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.