My favourite pizza is pepperoni, red onions and peppers. There's a local pizza place where I live which makes amazing pizzas.
It claims Domino's is the "most improved". I actually think it sucks compared to the more generic taste it used to have.
The only bad thing about Papa John's is that the smallest size pizza they make is medium. I can't eat a whole medium pizza in one go, and their pizza tastes like $)#(*%( as leftovers...
Pfft. As if an Italian knows anything about pizza!Best pizza?
Neapolitan-style crust (thin but not too thin), San Marzano tomatoes, mozzarella di bufala campana as cheese, Emilian sausage, porcini mushrooms, a drizzle of extra-virgin olive oil.
No contest.
The husband and i have been married 30+ years and every friday night (unless something comes up) we have had pizza for dinner. We'd get it from the best pizza place EVER that was in the next town until it was discovered that the owner was a convicted pedophile (lovely, right?) We stopped going there and had to find another place to go to.
So the man serves the time for his crime and makes atonement, but you still shun him and deny his service, even though it is superior?
I know a guy who made a single mistake in his life as a young man, and got put on the list forever. One of the greatest people I know, been married to a lovely lady for something like forty years and has a great family.
People can change, but only if you give them a chance.
*gets off soapbox now*
I do not want to derail this thread but....
You're damn fucking straight. He was NOT a 19 year old, he was a 35 year old. He was arrested MULTIPLE times for acts. This is the same pedophile that moved in two doors down from me. When i was notified by the cops (thanks to the law, which btw, sucks ass because by law at the time, people only within a TWO DOOR RADIUS had to be told), and i asked the cops did i need to worry their reply was, "Mrs. M, i cannot tell you what he was arrested for, only what he pled down to and was convicted of. Yes, i would worry." THE COPS WORDS.
He was a level 3 (most likely to repeat offend) and he did after that last conviction. So yeah, fuck it, i'm NOT going to go to his pizza parlor (another loophole. Who goes to pizza parlors? FUCKING KIDS DO.)
Thank you MLB and Nerys.
So, Subcommander, come back to me when you have kids and a repeat convicted pedophile moves in or opens a pizza place near you. THEN we'll talk.
Sorry...but I wouldn't give a pedophile a chance around my children. Recidivism rates for pedophilia are quite high compared to other sex crimes, and I would not take that chance. But then I personally believe pedophilia, due to the extreme effects it has on a person, for life, should merit either life in prison or the death penalty, automatically.
I would never dream of saying that about a 19 year old who got caught having consensual sex with a 17 year old and got put on the list for statutory rape, but when it comes to pedophiles...I am sorry, but I just think the danger is too great.
^ First off, YR can swear any time she likes. So can any of the rest of us. This isn't a public school, you know. Swearing is par for the course around here!
As for the other thing: There's a difference between compassion and "being realistic when dealing with a dangerous offender that can - and apparently DID - offend again.
Profanity should be used only under extreme circumstances otherwise it has no point. It also lacks a place in polite discourse.
Being realistic is fine. But choosing specifically to shun someone and subvert their business?
The phrasing of the circumstances initially indicated carryout, thus the 'boycott' seems entirely based on the man's criminal record.
Jean Valjean in Digne after release? Its not a popular stance, but someone has to take it.
Watch like a hawk if you will, but dehumanizing someone and shunning them? No.
Man, I love pizza.![]()
Profanity should be used only under extreme circumstances otherwise it has no point. It also lacks a place in polite discourse.
That's why I love this board so much - we don't have to be polite.
Being realistic is fine. But choosing specifically to shun someone and subvert their business?
The phrasing of the circumstances initially indicated carryout, thus the 'boycott' seems entirely based on the man's criminal record.
Jean Valjean in Digne after release? Its not a popular stance, but someone has to take it.
Watch like a hawk if you will, but dehumanizing someone and shunning them? No.
The fact remains, YR is entirely within her rights to go there, or not to go there. She's not out front posting leaflets about the guy, she just chooses not to give the place her money. That is her absolute right. And judging by what she has said, it's not just that he has a record, but it is apparently *continuing*.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.