It was before the UFP and the music reflected that.
I'm watching The Forge. I skipped the song as usual. I just hate it so much. The only way I could hate it more is if it were sung by Rom.
And you simply had to troll this otherwise positive thread.I'm watching The Forge. I skipped the song as usual. I just hate it so much. The only way I could hate it more is if it were sung by Rom.
I always wished they had used the rejected original TMP music for Enterprise.
It grew on my as a song but as a title theme I still don´t like it. I love the ending theme though.
I thought the end music to Enterprise sounded tired. It certainly didn't seem like a lot of inspiration went into it. "ok.. nuther one.. heavy on horns light on percussion. coming right up. ding"The end credits theme sounds like something intended for a space program series rather than Star Trek, which is more about the romanticized aspects of the journey and what’s out there than technological beginnings and breakthroughs. ENT tries very hard to connect ST to the here and now, but it really should be as distant as possible. Roddenberry wrote in the beginning that the year could just as easily be 2995; how we got there ought to be a faint memory.
I thought the end music to Enterprise sounded tired. It certainly didn't seem like a lot of inspiration went into it. "ok.. nuther one.. heavy on horns light on percussion. coming right up. ding"
But that's what the premise of Enterprise is. It's a show about man's early days going out into the galaxy. It's a sequel to First Contact. Each show has its own identity, and its own unique premise. The premise of TOS has no bearing on that. And any ideas of TOS "could take place in any time" were permanently squashed by the time TNG started.The end credits theme sounds like something intended for a space program series rather than Star Trek, which is more about the romanticized aspects of the journey and what’s out there than technological beginnings and breakthroughs. ENT tries very hard to connect ST to the here and now, but it really should be as distant as possible. Roddenberry wrote in the beginning that the year could just as easily be 2995; how we got there ought to be a faint memory.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.