Yeah IMDb is always fluid while things are in production.........much like wikipedia.IMDB says he is, so I am guessing he is
Yeah IMDb is always fluid while things are in production.........much like wikipedia.IMDB says he is, so I am guessing he is
Yeah if he is updated and a real smuggler type, then I may enjoy the new Mudd......if he's campy, I'll pass but from the trailer I'm optimistic.I expect a rebooted Harry Mudd. If not, I expect CBS All Access will have at least one less subscriber.![]()
I like Mudd but if he's in it a lot it will push Discovery towards The Orville territory.
Reimagine his character. Reimagine.Depends on how they reboot his character. This could be anything from wonderful to horrific. But if he's so important to the show he's in that many episodes, I can't possibly see how they DIDN'T reboot him. What on earth does Discovery need a Harry Mudd in 9 episodes for is the real question.
Shows Michelle Yeoh for 15 episodes as well and she hasn't been on set in about a month........
We can but hope. I always thought Mudd was a dreadfully unfunny, lame and dated character. If Rhainn Wilson doesnt work some serious magic, I can easily see me skipping episodes the revolve around him.I expect a rebooted Harry Mudd. If not, I expect CBS All Access will have at least one less subscriber.![]()
This way they can have ferengi-like episodes without coming up with convoluted explanations for why they were unknown in TNG.Harcourt Fenton Mudd (Rainn Wilson) character would be seen “multiple times”
They aren't unknown in TNG, just officially unseen.This way they can have ferengi-like episodes without coming up with convoluted explanations for why they were unknown in TNG.
I always thought Mudd was a dreadfully unfunny, lame and dated character.
Really? He's basically Han Solo or Star Lord without the sex appeal. I don't see how that sort of archetypal rogue character "dates".
You can also see the origin of Q in Mudd as far as how he becomes this recurring thorn in the side of a captain. He's not really evil, just sort of a juvenile delinquent.
"Mudd's Women" and its appalling sexism
What makes you think they would write the character the same way they did 50 years ago?
Or "Star Trek: Here's Mudd In Your Eye"?How long before they finally reveal the new name of the show: “Star Trek: Harry Mudd”?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.