I would take Mike Sussman over Terry Matallis.Sussman is not Aaron Sorkin.
Not everyone can make diplomacy entertaining.
I would take Mike Sussman over Terry Matallis.Sussman is not Aaron Sorkin.
Not everyone can make diplomacy entertaining.
Lord King Terry, thou hast blasphemed.I would take Mike Sussman over Terry Matallis.
I doubt anything's happening on the United front at all. Sussman's probably on the lot for something else and Trek fans are doing what they do best and reading far too into the post.‘Trolling’ might be too harsh a word. ‘Being intentionally vague with my Instagram post so as not to look stupid later’ might be more apt?
Unless he can squeeze out a TV movie before the contract expirations next year, time is just not on his side.I doubt anything's happening on the United front at all. Sussman's probably on the lot for something else and Trek fans are doing what they do best and reading far too into the post.
Indeed. After SNW and Academy end, I don't see us having any new Star Trek on television for a couple years at least. I know Kurtzman has alluded to some stuff being developed in the pipeline, but I don't have high confidence any of it gets produced under the new management at the studio.Unless he can squeeze out a TV movie before the contract expirations next year, time is just not on his side.
To be fair, not many really watched PICARD until S3.I can't see Paramount bringing back an aging Scott Bakula.
Archer is not Picard. No one watched him the first time. Why would they tune in NOW?

Because the world is not aging Trekkies, and Bakula is better known now than he was then.I can't see Paramount bringing back an aging Scott Bakula.
Archer is not Picard. No one watched him the first time. Why would they tune in NOW?
Because the world is not aging Trekkies, and Bakula is better known now than he was then.

And even if they could, Archer was never a diplomat, he was a dumbass who got the Enterprise job because of nepotism and then had to learn to listen to T'Pol to not fuck things up completely. There'd be at least 50 characters better suited for a show like that.Sussman is not Aaron Sorkin.
Not everyone can make diplomacy entertaining.
And even if they could, Archer was never a diplomat, he was a dumbass who got the Enterprise job because of nepotism and then had to learn to listen to T'Pol to not fuck things up completely. There'd be at least 50 characters better suited for a show like that.

Thanks to NCIS Scott Bakula probably still has still has higher name recognition then Patrick Stewart, even with Patrick Stewart's appearance in the X-Men franchise.And they wish to develop (another) series around this man.![]()

Well, around Scott Bakula and the Star Trek brand.And they wish to develop (another) series around this man.![]()
Thanks to Quantum Leap Scott Bakula had a higher name recognition than any other captain back when Enterprise started, that didn't really help. The problem wasn't his acting or star power, it was the writing. It felt like the writers were so concerned with creating a flawed and inexperienced captain that they mad him all flaws and no strengths.Thanks to NCIS Scott Bakula probably still has still has higher name recognition then Patrick Stewart, even with Patrick Stewart's appearance in the X-Men franchise.
There is no reason for President Archer to be written that way.Thanks to Quantum Leap Scott Bakula had a higher name recognition than any other captain back when Enterprise started, that didn't really help. The problem wasn't his acting or star power, it was the writing. It felt like the writers were so concerned with creating a flawed and inexperienced captain that they mad him all flaws and no strengths.
Archer was apparently a decent test pilot and then not much else. He had no diplomatic skills, he was not a scientist and not even a good leader, he let his bias against Vulcans getting in the way of seeing T'Pol as the valuable asset she was and using her usually sensible advice to his advantage. The ship and crew were in danger more than once because he ignored her for no other reason than "humans do it differently".
And they wish to develop (another) series around this man.![]()
And yet, at least according to the bio that we saw in IaMD pt1, he was the Federation ambassador to Andor for 10 years.Archer... had no diplomatic skills...
Archer was apparently a decent test pilot and then not much else. He had no diplomatic skills, he was not a scientist and not even a good leader, he let his bias against Vulcans getting in the way of seeing T'Pol as the valuable asset she was and using her usually sensible advice to his advantage. The ship and crew were in danger more than once because he ignored her for no other reason than "humans do it differently".
Heaven forbid a studio wishes to work with a bankable actor and a profitable franchise.And they wish to develop (another) series around this man.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.