While I personally think you're one of the nicer posters around here in that you're not forcing your viewpoints via mocking emojis, personal insults, and the like, you are extremely persistent in repeating your viewpoints again and again and again that most of new Trek is an alternate timeline. This is not meant as a personal attack or an insult against you, but more of an observation.
The stance of the corporate owner is that they're the same timeline, minus the Eugenics War changes. You've made your claims many times on how it should be an alternate timeline but haven't convinced a lot of people. It also seems that you aren't keen on other explanations, such as my own "refit between shows" fan explanation (which itself isn't popular and unforunately has gotten me personal attacks, mocking emojis and the like, and I appreciate you not ever taking part in any of that vileness). However, at this point, I'm not sure what new there is to say and your repeating the same points will probably get you the same personal attacks etc. that seem to be the norm around here unfortunately when a viewpoint doesn't fit the "majority".
Perhaps you should create your own Trek "timeline" on your own website or as a fanbook or something minus SNW etc. Star Wars fans have done so (Supernatural Encounters for example as well as a complete Legends timeline book that excludes Filoni's Clone Wars because the author insisted it wasn't part of Legends canon despite Lucasfilm's stance)
You could also reach out to Bernd Schneider of Ex Astris Scientia for collaborating, as he also is of the viewpoint that most of new Trek is an alternate timeline, at least his website seems to indicate this.
You may also want to move to reddit where the atmosphere is less generally hostile to non-majority ideas, as I've slowly been doing.