• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poll Ethan Peck's Spock

Are you OK with how Spock is being handled in SNW?

  • Yes

    Votes: 37 74.0%
  • No

    Votes: 13 26.0%

  • Total voters
    50
There's also the issue of character memory. Kirk says something happened a decade ago in TOS. Its shown in SNW to happen six years ago. Does that make it break precious continuity? God forbid we can't round.
 
Let's not kid ourselves here. Spock does not keep his emotions in check very well in SNW or Kelvin universe. He may have the occasional smirk or smile in TOS but he would not go around the ship saying he is bedding the ships nurse. That would be completely out of character for Nimoy Spock. Even when he went to the past and reverted back to an emotional Vulcan and was with Zarabeth.... immediately after he came back to the present he was back in full logic mode. Dismissing his love after with Zarabeth as something 5000 years in the past. Dead and buried. He had returned to the present in every sense he says to Mcoy...
That never made any sense. Vulcans are not born with logic, its not an innate genetic trait, its something learned. So him reverting to a barbaric Vulcan did not make any sense unless the machine stripped away his Vulcan logic, regardless of what time they ended up in.
 
Last edited:
In real life knowledge is added.
And we're not learning anything new in stories?

That never made any sense Vulcans are not born with logic its not an innate genetic trait its something learned. So him reverting to a barbaric Vulcan did not make any sense unless the machine stripped away his Vulcan logic regardless of what time they ended up in.
That really didn't make any sense. Even if it was a genetic trait he wouldn't have lost it by going back in time and they weren't processed by the machine or else they would've died when they came back.
 
Fiction has something similar, it's called a prequel.
It's not the same.

History is an entirely different study. Expecting fiction to be like history is setting up for disappointment.

In fiction you can have different actors, and set dressings, and costuming and build towards an entertaining story. You can ignore the facts because the goal is not truth but entertainment.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top