• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Enterprise J

We do have to admit that as much as we can debate canon (see other thread), it is a shakkle when it comes to federation starship design. They're just not that good looking.
We HAVE to admit that? I don't. I think many Federation starship designs are very good looking. I think the refit Enterprise in TMP is one of the most beautiful ships ever in film.
 
I just realised something, the Ent-J would look even better if there was no saucer on it. Could still fit a large crew by working like a TARDIS.

newentj.png
 
It looks skinnier than a Somalian refugee.

Oh right, this was from "Enterprise". Probably best ignore everything that happened in that show.

Slings and arrows...


Besides the fact that ENT is cannon, is mentioned in 11, its continuity is seen in the uniforms on the Kelvin and the writers have confirmed ENT is preserved as it was. In the Abramsverse ENT is all we have of what people might call the "prime" worldline, but that is abstract anyway as ENT was the result of the worldline changes of Enterprise-E in First Contact.
 
We do have to admit that as much as we can debate canon (see other thread), it is a shakkle when it comes to federation starship design. They're just not that good looking.
We HAVE to admit that? I don't. I think many Federation starship designs are very good looking. I think the refit Enterprise in TMP is one of the most beautiful ships ever in film.

Your not alone regarding refit/A.
 
It looks skinnier than a Somalian refugee.

Oh right, this was from "Enterprise". Probably best ignore everything that happened in that show.

Slings and arrows...


Besides the fact that ENT is cannon, is mentioned in 11, its continuity is seen in the uniforms on the Kelvin and the writers have confirmed ENT is preserved as it was. In the Abramsverse ENT is all we have of what people might call the "prime" worldline, but that is abstract anyway as ENT was the result of the worldline changes of Enterprise-E in First Contact.

This is how I see it:

TIMELINE1.png
 
We do have to admit that as much as we can debate canon (see other thread), it is a shakkle when it comes to federation starship design. They're just not that good looking.
We HAVE to admit that? I don't. I think many Federation starship designs are very good looking. I think the refit Enterprise in TMP is one of the most beautiful ships ever in film.

Your not alone regarding refit/A.

For sure. That's a beautiful ship.
 
The Enterprise-J is what happens when you photoshop the NX-01 up the wahzoo when you don't have the budget or time to render a full CGI model of a ship for an episode.

There is no guarantee that this ship will ever come into existence because the future is never fixed in stone. It's fluid, and changes frequently. "All Good Things...", "The Visitor," "Endgame," are all possible Trek futures that never came to pass for various reasons. There is no reason to suggest that this won't be the case either.

Ignoring the non-canon Ships of the Line Calendar, for all intents and purposes, this ship was the NX-01-J Enterprise and came from only one of many possible futures...like Star Trek XI.


That might be true if not for the fact that the J you see on ENT is a schematic, the J you see in the picture if a full render made for a calender celebrating all the cannon versions of the Enterprise. Love it or hate it, timeline or not J is cannon.
No, it isn't. It's just a ship from a possible future. The real Enterprise-J may not look anything like that photoshopped pizza cutter (and God help us, it never will).
 
Slings and arrows...


Besides the fact that ENT is cannon, is mentioned in 11, its continuity is seen in the uniforms on the Kelvin and the writers have confirmed ENT is preserved as it was. In the Abramsverse ENT is all we have of what people might call the "prime" worldline, but that is abstract anyway as ENT was the result of the worldline changes of Enterprise-E in First Contact.

This is how I see it:

TIMELINE1.png

So when the Enterprise-E saves the Phoenix and then goes back into the future what stops it from emerging in the nuUniverse 24th Century instead?

untitled1b1.jpg


Will it ever happen now. :scream: My favorite enterprise.
Perfect Enterprise design for the time period. Sure the design looks odd, but Daniels says in the episode that Klingons are now members of the Federation (possibly others, Cardassians, Romulans, etc.). You can clearly see the injection of Klingon/Cardassian/Romulan culture and style being injected into the traditional fed design.
 
So when the Enterprise-E saves the Phoenix and then goes back into the future what stops it from emerging in the nuUniverse 24th Century instead?

When it goes forward again it does end up once again in a new universe but the Ent-E of that new universe also goes back in time following the Borg so basically there's only 1 Ent-E in the future. Technically because of this there should be 4 timelines on my chart but it's that irrelevant I decided to keep it off to make things apear more simple.
 
It looks skinnier than a Somalian refugee.

Oh right, this was from "Enterprise". Probably best ignore everything that happened in that show.
We can't. It's the only thing that's in current timeline! :scream:
No it's not.

It looks skinnier than a Somalian refugee.

Oh right, this was from "Enterprise". Probably best ignore everything that happened in that show.
We can't. It's the only thing that's in current timeline! :scream:

Yea true that. The events in ENT are the only things we CAN be certain about in this new alternate timeline. Of course in the ENT timeline Zephrim's first warp flight had Riker and Jordi on board. :)

So really, this timeline still require the exsistance of the previous timeline.
No again.

The Enterprise J was part of the timeline that led from Riker and LaForge being on Cochrane's test flight up to the quantum probability that Crewman Daniels was native to. That probability, as we saw, got whacked. Thus, no Enterprise-J as we (sorta) know it exists in that future of the Archer depicted on Enterprise. Much less the exit ramp of probabilities generated by Nero and the Narada entering the timeline in 2233.

However - form frequently follows function, so if there was a good functional reason for the -J to look like it does, it or something very similar will emerge at some point. And, Archer saw the ship, and most likely included its design in his reports to Starfleet Command, increasing the probability that that specific design will be examined for utility by Starfleet.

Not to mention that there are any number of probable futures for that version of Archer that, while not the exact one that Daniels came from, are only the barest measure of different from it.

I'd say if anything, the odds are good that we'll see a similar ship developed earlier than it originally was. If "originally" means anything in a discussion of multiple probability states. ;)

Going meta for a moment, I'd also have to say it is more likely that we'll see something like it again, since future artists coming up with stuff for Trek will have it to look at, whereas they didn't before. :techman:
Yes, thank-you.

untitled1b1.jpg



Nice ship!
AGREED!

The writers have said as far as destiny goes, Picard will still end up as Captain/Enterprise-D etc. Though I have no idea what the fuck the Enterprise-J is, is that some Enterprise crap? I like to think that the prophets still see Sisko's path, and Picard has the same destiny as Kirk did in this film. But apart from that, I can live without everything else. The Trek canon was screwed with Voyager.
Long before that I'm afraid.

I like it, but technically that image is fan made. The only canon image of the Ent-J we see is a distant blurry schematic on a wall in an ENT episode.
The image was made by Doug Drexler.
Indeed. I'm just glad this underside didn't make the cut; it's horrible. I love the thing itself, though. Especially the idea of a floating city in space.
I like it.

This is how I see it:

TIMELINE1.png
Nope. Nero erased the Borg coming back in time so Cochrane was alone on his trip just as he was the first time through. The NCC-1701 will also now never travel back to the 1969 in Tomorrow is Yesterday, 1968 to meet Gary Seven or to 1982's to save the whales. The NCC-1701-D will not go back to the 19th century to leave behind Data's head. The timeline is irrevocably changed by Nero's trip. The Prime timeline is erased and even if it could somehow still exist in a parallel universe, it could not affect this new one ever again. Didn't anybody watch Primer?

X
 
^ How are you all so sure that there was a timeline where Cochrane *didn't* make his flight with the assistance of Riker and Geordi? For all we know, it always happened that way - a classic predestination paradox.
 
I think the refit Enterprise in TMP is one of the most beautiful ships ever in film.

Your not alone regarding refit/A.

For sure. That's a beautiful ship.

I'd like to add my two quatloos in and also say the TMP 1701 & 1701-A are the best looking Enterprises.
I saw the new Matchbox Enterprise's at Walmart about a half-hour ago, and the first thing I said was, "Ooh, pretty."

I had to try really hard not to buy it.
 
^ How are you all so sure that there was a timeline where Cochrane *didn't* make his flight with the assistance of Riker and Geordi? For all we know, it always happened that way - a classic predestination paradox.

I believe that the Shatnerverse MU novels (which I realize are probably the furthest thing from "canon" that we have out there) addressed this. Something about a lake on the moon being called Lake Sloane (after Lily) in one reality and the same lake being called Lake Riker in the other reality.

But ya know, it's the Shatnerverse, so it doesn't really count.
 
I only read the first two pages of this thread, but people STILL seem to be missing the point that Trek XI is in an ALTERNATE REALITY/TIMELINE/WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, and the original timeline is still there. Everything that happened in ENT, TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY and the first 10 movies ALL STILL HAPPENED, and things continue to happen in that timeline.

Again. TREK XI = Alternate reality. What happens in this new Trek has no bearing whatsoever on how history unfolded in the original timeline.

they even say it's an alternate reality in Trek XI, for bejeebus sake. LOL.
 
Last edited:
I only read the first two pages of this thread, but people STILL seem to be missing the point that Trek XI is in an ALTERNATE REALITY/TIMELINE/WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, and the original timeline is still there. Everything that happened in ENT, TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY and the first 10 movies ALL STILL HAPPENED, and things continue to happen in that timeline.

Again. TREK XI = Alternate reality. What happens in this new Trek has no bearing whatsoever on how history unfolded in the original timeline.
They aren't missing anything. They are just too stubborn to accept it.
 
^ And they're not blue enough. Plus there should be some lens flares in that photo, or it's clearly not real enough.
 
I just realised something, the Ent-J would look even better if there was no saucer on it. Could still fit a large crew by working like a TARDIS.

newentj.png

Didn't someone do some artwork of it in this configuration before? I can't recall if it was a member here or someone who worked on the show, but I definitely remember seeing a photoshopped pic of it like this before.

I like the version with the saucer too, but I think that this would be a pretty cool separating section from the saucer of the ship.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top