^I'm busy finishing up book 2 (deadline is Monday) and then Shore Leave is just days later. I haven't had an opportunity to do the annotations yet.
^Oh. I think I see what you mean. I'm not sure I agree with that reading, either of the book or the movie in question.
^Somewhere in between those.
It was very much a 'setting the scene' novel, but the political angle was the most interesting - I'd have liked a little more of it.
My major gripe was that both of the 'ship' stories were resolved with a slightly heavy emphasis on the way forward being exploration and understanding. I'm not arguing against that - it's at the heart of Star Trek, but to have two stories making the same point seemed a bit much.
It was very much a 'setting the scene' novel, but the political angle was the most interesting - I'd have liked a little more of it.
There will be a lot of politics in Book 2.
My major gripe was that both of the 'ship' stories were resolved with a slightly heavy emphasis on the way forward being exploration and understanding. I'm not arguing against that - it's at the heart of Star Trek, but to have two stories making the same point seemed a bit much.
Well, that's what themes are for -- to unify the parts of a whole. Besides, it wouldn't have had as much impact on the Federation if they'd given conflicting messages.
Anyway, as I see it, they're not quite the same -- the Endeavour plot's resolution relies more on diplomacy, while the Pioneer one relies more on science and exploration. Although there is some overlap.
Speaking of Tucker, I, for one, am curious to see where his story goes from here. It's clear that he doesn't entirely like working for Section 31, but he also believes that their presence is a necessary evil in the current political climate. Based on where he ends up in the epilogue of To Brave the Storm, though, I wonder if something will eventually happen that causes him to change his mind and get out of the spy game.
^I explained why Trip doesn't feel he can face his family and friends anymore. Whether that will last remains to be seen, but he does have a reason for avoiding them.
Basically, the previous books kept Trip from "coming back to life" through a series of hard-luck plot twists and misadventures that kept him from returning to his old life as he wanted. I figured that couldn't keep happening forever, so I needed to find an internal reason why he would've chosen not to go back. Given that, by this point, he'd been "dead" for seven years and gone through many traumatic, life-changing experiences, I could believe that he just felt he was no longer the man he'd been and that it was kinder to his loved ones to let them have closure and move on with their lives.
^Count yourself lucky that you can't see things that way. He does because he's been through all sorts of hell and made awful compromises and choices.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.