*Shush*.... I think I detected a note of/\ Come again?
.
sarcasm


*Shush*.... I think I detected a note of/\ Come again?
.
i watched 7th season's 'chimera' earlier this week. nice scene when laas it attacked by a klingon with a dagger, and he shapes his arm into a sword. "mine is bigger". a 'terminator' ripp-off? 'crocodile dundee'? everything is reused.I'm not sure there's anyone who doesn't clearly see Alien in Macrocosm, and I'm not even sure what Rapture is meant to be a take off of.
looked a couple of star trek data bases with episode rankings up, macrocosm is everywhere better rated than rapture, rapture in fact counts as one of ds9's poorest episodes.
If I go to this website I will find lots of information about how evolution is false and how the bible is factually correct on the subject of creation. That doesn't mean that that's the case, it just means that if you're looking for something on the internet you'll a website to support your position.looked a couple of star trek data bases with episode rankings up, macrocosm is everywhere better rated than rapture, rapture in fact counts as one of ds9's poorest episodes. i'm sure people with a liking of the paranormal love it, but i'm not one of them.
Generally speaking, episodes dealing with Bajoran religion hadn't been particularly popular among either the fans or the studio (see Background Information for the episode "Accession" for more information). As such, the writers and producers were shocked when this episode proved to be exceptionally popular amongst the fans. Executive producer Ira Steven Behr commented on the popularity of this episode, "I was surprised at the response it generated. [The fans] really seemed to take to this, to the spirituality, the faith. This is the episode that made me realize just what we had created in terms of the Bajoran faith and the Emissary. I knew that it was going to become a more and more important part of the show, and that a part of the audience was going to love it."
lets start with the probably best: http://ditl.org/looked a couple of star trek data bases with episode rankings up, macrocosm is everywhere better rated than rapture, rapture in fact counts as one of ds9's poorest episodes.
.....guh? Where are these databases?
Memory Alpha is not just any website.Rapture is actually one of the best regarded DS9, episodes, here's what it says on MA (and yes, I realise the irony in using a website to back up my claim after saying that websites are meaningless):
Yes, it is crap. But not because it's Voyager, but because it's a shitty episode.i'm curious about the evaluation of voyager's 'coda' in a couple of days, another paranormal story. well, it's gonna be crap of course, it's voyager.
The ratings there are quite sketchy. 3 stars for False Profits, really? And why bring up Coda when it's got the same rating as Rapture?lets start with the probably best: http://ditl.org/
I've never been to that website before. Here's a counter anyway, from the only website on the first page of a Google search for "Star Trek reviews" that isn't about Trek XI. And here's his review of Macrocosm. Seriously, how could you have skipped Jammer's Reviews when searching these "databases"?lets start with the probably best: http://ditl.org/
No, it's going to be crap because Coda is a stinking pile of crap. It's not paranormal, it's an alien-induced dream story that has all the subtlety of Glenn Beck. This douchebag covered it and this douchebag covered it.i'm curious about the evaluation of voyager's 'coda' in a couple of days, another paranormal story. well, it's gonna be crap of course, it's voyager.
I don't read the books so I'm not sure what you mean, but did they namecheck the website or the Memory Alpha from TOS The Lights of Zetar?Memory Alpha is not just any website.How many Trek websites got name-checked in an official Trek novel?
![]()
When it's mentioned in the novels themselves it might be the latter, though I like to think it was a little nod as wellI don't read the books so I'm not sure what you mean, but did they namecheck the website or the Memory Alpha from TOS The Lights of Zetar?Memory Alpha is not just any website.How many Trek websites got name-checked in an official Trek novel?
![]()
no doubt, you'll heap praise upon rapture just because it's ds9, and macrocosm is a blatant alien rip-off because it's voyager.
i watched 7th season's 'chimera' earlier this week. nice scene when laas it attacked by a klingon with a dagger, and he shapes his arm into a sword. "mine is bigger". a 'terminator' ripp-off? 'crocodile dundee'? everything is reused.
lets start with the probably best: http://ditl.org/looked a couple of star trek data bases with episode rankings up, macrocosm is everywhere better rated than rapture, rapture in fact counts as one of ds9's poorest episodes.
.....guh? Where are these databases?
That said, I seldom put much stock in their episode rating system. They just couldn't compare to guys like Jammer or ...um, geez, what was that guy before Jammer again? Even did TNG reviews back in the usenet days? Cripes, that's ages ago!
How about Genesis and Terok Nor? Perhaps not quite the same level, but not quite so far off either.Ah, Aliens! Now that was a great film. Unfortunately, Star Trek has never been able to approach that level of intensity, not in Starship Mine, not in First Contact and certainly not here. It's sort of OK, but I'd rather be watching Sigourney!
Once Kira goes on her revenge quest, she breaks a whole bunch of rules and recklessly endangers O'Brien's child in the process.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.