Basically, two people traumatized in different ways by the same event. Somehow one is more worthy of sympathy from the audience than the other?Thank you for this; I was trying to figure out when Sisko had ever been pissy at a rape victim.
Basically, two people traumatized in different ways by the same event. Somehow one is more worthy of sympathy from the audience than the other?Thank you for this; I was trying to figure out when Sisko had ever been pissy at a rape victim.
Personally I don't think it's a competition. Other's mileage may vary.Basically, two people traumatized in different ways by the same event. Somehow one is more worthy of sympathy from the audience than the other?
Too be clear, I'm not claiming one could decide between the two ... or should.Personally I don't think it's a competition. Other's mileage may vary.
Picard unwillingly joined a cult and then killed Sisko's wife before being rescued from the cult and deprogrammed
Basically, two people traumatized in different ways by the same event. Somehow one is more worthy of sympathy from the audience than the other?
I'm a bit baffled as to why Sisk's being accused of being "unreasonably pissy" or showing "irrational hostility" when that's the point. As the Prophets themselves say, Sisko has existed at the moment of his wife's death and hasn't been able to move past it.
This seems akin to criticizing "Measure of a Man" for spending so much time dwelling on the question of whether Data should have rights.
It's an attempt to at least frame it from Sisko's perspective, as opposed to 'Sisko hates someone because they got raped', which does not describe the situation at all.I think that's a much less apt metaphor, because cults and cult deprogramming are very real human phenomena, and literal mind control is not, so "unwillingly joined a cult" does not adequately convey the horror of Borg assimilation.
It's grossly unprofessional to speak in a gruff manner?but no right to berate Picard for something that wasn't remotely his fault. Not to mention, it's grossly unprofessional.
IIRC, Andre Bormanis let down the TNG writers by telling them the actual Apollo 13 astronauts were significantly more sedate than their movie counterparts. If professionalism were something accurately portrayed in Trek, there would be little dialogue left. A lot is exaggerated to make for dramatic and entertaining television.It's grossly unprofessional to speak in a gruff manner?
Is it logical
Right? I'm not sure what rights you are referring to. There is no hierarchy of suffering. Michael Piller wrote both episodes, and he decided that his hero needed to express his pain to the face that represented it. From Family to this episode, Picard was considered rto have been healed ( in the TV sense, of course). If Picard could take it in stride, so can the fans.Of course not, but, like I said, Sisko has every right to seek therapy for his trauma, but no right to berate Picard for something that wasn't remotely his fault. Not to mention, it's grossly unprofessional.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.