Agree on the collars, but the 1940s spaceman shoulders are no good, either.
I like them. It's that little bit of retro-futuristic cheesiness that a modern Trek series needs.
Agree on the collars, but the 1940s spaceman shoulders are no good, either.
25% differentThe bridge looks so good, but the uniforms look so bad. :/
I like them. It's that little bit of retro-futuristic cheesiness that a modern Trek series needs.
Why does a modern Trek series need retro-futuristic cheesiness?
It's a franchise with over 50 years of history, a franchise that's been running that long needs little visual signifiers to connect with its roots.
This looks so much better. Have we seen these in any colour besides the blue?agreed on the collars. but there appears to be a variant in the new short treks trailer that does not have the collar or the asymmetrical zipper:
![]()
![]()
no but fingers crossed they get them to the enterprise crew before they get their own spinoff.This looks so much better. Have we seen these in any colour besides the blue?
Really hoping so.no but fingers crossed they get them to the enterprise crew before they get their own spinoff.
What in STD doesn't qualify?Why does a modern Trek series need retro-futuristic cheesiness?
here's my idea about this, call me crazy:
don't make a pike series or a georgiou/section 31 series. instead, fulfill bryan fuller's concept of a star trek anthology show and do both and more. the producers now have sets for the enterprise and the section 31 ship in their back pocket, they're no longer hamstrung by the expense of building assets for a single season then moving on from them. they can do a season of pike, a season of section 31, a season of starfleet academy, and then move on and tell different stories too. the benefit being we won't get overwhelmed by the sheer number of these shows or tired of them once the novelty wears off, like we did with netflix's marvel shows. if there's a demand for more pike, the anthology show can circle back and continue that story. or, at the very least, they could announce these shows as limited series and dodge that looming notion of "star trek fatigue" which is already being whispered about.
anyway, just a thought.
This I fully support! It would be really cool. People like to see how these characters are doing after all these years, and this would allow to do something bespoke to them, instead of them all just showing up on Picard. (Not that I have anything against familiar faces appearing on that show either.)Hell, we could even have Short Treks centered around Deep Space Nine, Voyager, or Enterprise characters.
This I fully support! It would be really cool. People like to see how these characters are doing after all these years, and this would allow to do something bespoke to them, instead of them all just showing up on Picard. (Not that I have anything against familiar faces appearing on that show either.)
Exactly my point. I appreciate the love and passion for the characters, and the nostalgia factor plays very heavily here. But, I also want it to make sense in the context of the story. Randomly dropping in characters just because is just making "small universe syndrome" all the more apparent.I don't have anything against them appearing on Picard either, but, it would have to make sense within the context of the story. I don't want characters from past Trek shows popping up at random times just because they can.
It would be almost as silly as making the main character an adopted sister of a previous well known character, and then dragging that character and his mates from the previous show (albeit all recast) on the new show.Exactly my point. I appreciate the love and passion for the characters, and the nostalgia factor plays very heavily here. But, I also want it to make sense in the context of the story. Randomly dropping in characters just because is just making "small universe syndrome" all the more apparent.
Yeah, that was pretty silly. I shouldn't expect anything less from a Star Trek production.It would be almost as silly as making the main character an adopted sister of a previous well known character, and then dragging that character and his mates from the previous show (albeit all recast) on the new show.
...and then revealing that this character and his mates still more exciting than new original characters...It would be almost as silly as making the main character an adopted sister of a previous well known character, and then dragging that character and his mates from the previous show (albeit all recast) on the new show.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.