Drop the S31 show for a Captain Pike show?

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by Tom, May 2, 2019.

?

Drop the Section 31 show for a the Pike show?

  1. Yes, I want a Pike show, and do not want a Section 31 show.

    102 vote(s)
    56.7%
  2. No, I want a Section 31 show, and do not want a show with Pike.

    7 vote(s)
    3.9%
  3. I want a show that feature both Pike and crew on the Enterprise and Section 31 with Georgiou.

    18 vote(s)
    10.0%
  4. I trust CBS to give me something I will like!

    11 vote(s)
    6.1%
  5. I want to see both! as separate shows.

    42 vote(s)
    23.3%
  1. ozzfloyd

    ozzfloyd Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Irrelevant. If he can critique the DSC writers his work is certainly open critique as well.
     
    fireproof78 likes this.
  2. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    That's a bit of a fallacy, isn't it? Otherwise, none of us could critique anything, now could we? I mean, I don't think we have much space to critique anyway, but that doesn't stop, well, anyone.
     
  3. Dukhat

    Dukhat Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    And it was irrelevant to point out that Dennis wrote Tin Man as if that was some kind of slight against him. What exactly did pointing that out have to do with him critiquing DSC?
     
    Longinus and starsuperion like this.
  4. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    Tastes vary and nothing is above critique? :shrug:
     
    ozzfloyd likes this.
  5. Dukhat

    Dukhat Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Then I hope you didn't write something that was nothing short of a masterpiece, or you're in for some serious trouble, apparently. ;)
     
  6. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    You're sticking up for a guy who wouldn't hestitate to bully you if he felt like it. He's doing this for kicks. He doesn't care. This is his way of killing time, to see how many shots he can get in the rim. If he were another poster, I'd agree with you. But he's laughing at all of us, even the posters who think they're on his side. The sooner everyone wakes up to this, the better.
     
    PiotrB and ozzfloyd like this.
  7. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    Even if I did I would still be in trouble. It's like trying to order pizza toppings in a group. No one will be completely happy.
     
    Dukhat likes this.
  8. Dukhat

    Dukhat Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    I'm not sticking up for Dennis personally. I don't even know him. I just felt he was being unfairly targeted. And I've never had any kind of experience with him like what you've described.
     
  9. Gepard

    Gepard Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    This is the key point right here. He's been winding people up since the ENT forum days, and he's good at doing it in ways that skirt the rules. The sooner he's ignored, the better.
     
  10. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    Hey, speaking of rules, how about we go back to discussing posts and not the poster before this thread gets shut down?
     
    Dukhat likes this.
  11. NewHeavensNewEarth

    NewHeavensNewEarth Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    I appreciate a person getting 1 at-bat in the Major Leagues, or even 1 home run (as an example), but it doesn't entitle a person to be a bully. You're spot-on.
     
    Lord Garth likes this.
  12. Alan Roi

    Alan Roi Commodore Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    I think throwing around the term 'grimdark' at whatever one hopes it will stick to is a superficial and indulgent posture at this point.
     
  13. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    [​IMG]

    I found an interesting article that included a quote from one of the showrunners that I find interesting:
    It would be an error to assume that something like TOS's wrap up and move on despite the emotional pain and difficulty that the characters go through. City on the Edge of Forever is considered Trek at its best and yet it is an episode that has some rather dark implications regarding the future of humanity for a time. That, in order to have the future Kirk wants, someone must die.

    That is interesting but hardly light-hearted, or adventure filled romp. It's dealing with the nature of fate, and destiny and sacrifice.

    Now, I don't think that Discovery and City are a one-to-one comparison, but I do think that the idea of introducing darker concepts, like spy agencies, and morally questionable actions, is not new to Star Trek, and invites more discourse, not less.
     
    Lord Garth, SJGardner and Alan Roi like this.
  14. Serveaux

    Serveaux The Man Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Always seeking new and better distractions
    But of course, COTEF is an exceptionally well-written fifty-minute TV drama,* which is complete in itself - it's nearly as good whether or not one has seen or ever will see another episode of Star Trek. A Twilight Zone or Outer Limits story.

    Which is something that none of the STD writers have demonstrated, on the show, even the whisper of a suggestion that they're capable of.

    I suppose there's hope; they've moved from borderline-incompetent scripts in Year One to disposable CW-level nonsense in Year Two.

    Also, of course, TOS then moved on from COTEF and did entirely different kinds of shows, each a complete story, with quite a range of tones. Again, on the evidence this bunch can't really be expected to do that; fortunately there are other skiffy shows that do it, and do it well.

    COTEF happens to be my favorite Trek episode, but you know it ain't the one that shows up at the number one spot in most fan polls - that goes to a light comedy about something called "tribbles."

    The question might be asked "if you can't write a good hour-long story, what makes you think you can write a multi-part saga?"**

    STD's answer has pretty much been "Doesn't matter, as long as you can stretch the plot bits out long enough that the audience doesn't figure out for sure that you don't know what you're doing until the last couple of episodes."

    *As good as it is, COTEF does fall back on a terrible cliche that Ellison was far too fond of and used in several of his well-known works: let's make a sympathetic hero out of a guy who's killed his girlfriend. We've seen another bad example of this just recently in a mega-successful prestige cable drama. Paraphrasing Lindsay Ellis, "Every violent guy who kills his wife thinks he's this hero; he had to do it."

    **Well, not "might be asked" - was, on several occasions, by producers slogging through multiple script submissions via the "open door" policy.
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2019
    Longinus and BillJ like this.
  15. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    And I don't them to do it either. I have no problem with the story or tone that they done thus far and believe they can continue to improve, like most Star Trek often does.

    YMMV.
     
  16. Noname Given

    Noname Given Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    None Given
    Your analysis is flawed in that STD BY DESIGN isn't set up to tell a standalone/self contained 50 minute story. It's designed so that each full season tells an overall story in parts. It's like judging an entire book on a single chapter and complaining said chapter doesn't work as a standalone story because it leaves elements hanging, etc.
     
  17. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    My larger point is that if that episode made today it would be multi-part arc to explore it. DSC, I agree, is a larger story and should be taken as such.
     
  18. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    If anyone doesn't mind, I'd like to look at the kinds of stories the S31 Series and Pike Series might actually tell. If that's okay with the peanut gallery.

    If S31 is Mission:Impossible-like, we might get episodes in the style of "The Enterprise Incident" (TOS), "Face of the Enemy" (TNG), or "Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges" (DS9). There was also an episode of ENT, I can't remember the episode title, where a Xindi is led to believe three years have passed and the war has turned right on its head. Straight out of the M:I playbook. I don't think every week is going to be an "In the Pale Moonlight".

    With a Pike Series, I'm guessing we'd see more types of episodes in the vein of "New Eden" or "Si Vis Pacem".
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2019
    SJGardner and fireproof78 like this.
  19. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    We also have missions that are like Picard and Co in "The Chain of Command" where it is basically a black ops type mission, where Starfleet cannot acknowledge their existence. Or, perhaps even missions like the Valiant, sent behind the lines for espionage purposes.

    Plus, as much as Trek loses its tech, you have them messing around with all kinds of experimental technology, and some of it could go wrong and then I would expect to be never referenced again.
     
    Lord Garth likes this.
  20. Crazyewok

    Crazyewok Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Why can't we have both?

    What is it these days where everything has to be a binary choice?
     
    Lord Garth likes this.