I agree. Would've been much more dramatic. I also agree with the "bland TV-like cinematography of TSFS". It has a less dramatic feel to most of the shots. EXCEPT for the space shots. Most of those are top notch (emphasis on most). Actually, and I talk with my buddy about this often, it's as if they spent ALL their budget on the new ships/craft we see in the film. We get the BoP, The Excelsior, the Oberth, Spacedock, and the merchant ship, all of which were great designs and went on to be used in countless Trek productions going forward. But most of the principal cinematography is.....just....meh. Almost every set onboard tne Enterprise sets looks as if they were lit cheaply, harshly, and quickly as opposed to their very soft, dim and dramatic representations in the previous two films.
Granted, these are just my opinions. I still love the dramatic beats of the film, I just wish the principal photography would've yielded better results.
I dunno, Maybe it's because I grew up a fan with these movies but I never thought this was a problem (I'm also blind to TOS' "Cheapness"). TSFS is a quiet interlude between the "downer" ending of WoK, and the more upbeat TVH. This may sound weird, but the bridge lighting in the latter part of the film reminds me of the sensation of getting a snack at midnight and the only thing on is a single kitchen night-light. But then, I've always seen WoK - TSFS - TVH as Dusk - Midnight - Morning in terms of feel. The minimal lighting also drives home that, "Enterprise feels like a house with all the children gone" sentiment as well.