Indeed it’s nothing new: Picard showed us incredibly old AIs that rebelled long ago...
That's one way of looking at it. But the premise it emerged from a federation database in the first place which emphasizes completely different approaches and methodologies (such as diplomacy, non aggressive behaviour, finding peaceful and scientific solutions to problems that benefit everyone, cooperation and sharing... Just to name a few) was nonsensical.
After Control debacle Starfleet gave Daystrom more funding.It was a Section 31 database, an organisation that believed the ends justified the means, amd didn’t have much time for Federation values.
It still makes sense to me that the danger wasn’t AI in general, just that one AI in particular and what it would use the sphere data to accomplish.
It must have a range, and a pretty short one at that.
Otherwise the Control problem could have been solved by simply jumping the ship to another galaxy and calling it a day.
And that was basically the primary flaw with the whole "going to the future is the only option" thing from season 2. Even if we entertain the idea that the Spore Drive can't actually go to another galaxy (even though, logically it should) we do know it could reach Terra Elysium, which was stated to be a journey of over 150 years at maximum warp. So right there they had an option of going any direction and being safe from Control for at least 150 years, longer if they didn't go to Terra Elysium since Spore Drive can't be tracked and even if it could, you can't track something in uncharted territory anyway.It must have a range, and a pretty short one at that.
Otherwise the Control problem could have been solved by simply jumping the ship to another galaxy and calling it a day.
No it wouldn't have, galaxies are huge places, and finding a single ship in one is like finding a needle in a planet sized haystack.... where Control would have caught up with it eventually.
which is more or less what was implied in Short Treks...But probably won’t happen.And that's assuming they were lazy about it, they could have just dumped the ship someplace random a billion billion lightyears away in the void between galaxies.
No it wouldn't have, galaxies are huge places, and finding a single ship in one is like finding a needle in a planet sized haystack.
Maybe, but if that were the case then taking it to the future wouldn't have kept it from the Data either.A hostile AI, focused on a singular goal, not bound by petty constraints like human lifespans, would, inevitably have found it.
And they could have done the same thing via dumping Discovery into a temporal anomaly.The reality is that time jumping to the future was a plot device to get the Discovery crew into the 32nd century.
I concur, tell that to the DISCO writing staff.Just because a thing has to happen, doesn't mean the path to get to that point needs to be full of plot holes.
The only time they've gone forwards in time was when crossing Dimensional boundaries into and back from the Mirror Universe.The spore drive can take them anywhere in the galaxy, to other universes, and months into the future during a war.
So, I would wager no limits in space travel or universe jumping. But possible limits in time travel, the extents of which are unknown. They can go forwards in time, but no proof that they can go back in time.
We have been, they don't seem to listen...I concur, tell that to the DISCO writing staff.
Why should they if people keep watching?We have been, they don't seem to listen...
At this point I rather suspect they just don't care.
About us nattering away on the internet? No, they don't.We have been, they don't seem to listen...
At this point I rather suspect they just don't care.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.