Who said "universally?"
The original post that you disagreed with said 'universally'.
Who said "universally?"
I think it's bizarre how harshly the design is dismissed by a lot of people here. The thing is georgeous, sexy, and definitely eye candy in the eyes of me and others. I think it's much better looking and more interesting to look at than any other Federation ships I can think of. The basic design of most don't make sense and look really awkward. This one just looks right and I want to gently caress it (and hopefully not get a cut from the sharp edges).
If we are in agreement then it doesn't.Did it ever occur to you that some of us may like the Discovery not because it is "beautiful" but because it has character and because it takes design cues from Trek's history?
Yes, so agreed. How does that affect what I've written?
I would feel good because it would serve a purpose story-wise. Design is also a big part of storytelling. Good design immediately tells you many things without an actor talking or one page of script. (And good design does not equal beautiful ship.)How will you feel if the creators admit to making it fugly on purpose?
I never doubted it. Some find the Discovery gorgeous, some simply like it, some find it ok with or without modifications and others find it hideous.Yes, Captain, "others" do say it's gorgeous, a synonym of beautiful.
I like it a lot. I wasn't a fan of the original design from the McQuarrie/Adam sketches but they improved the design a lot. I think it's great to see that design actually made official.
I like it a lot. I wasn't a fan of the original design from the McQuarrie/Adam sketches but they improved the design a lot. I think it's great to see that design actually made official.
It was concept art. And judging from past experience, there's no way fans would have been happy, no matter what the teaser was.I'm late to the party here but I think the design of Discovery looks terrific. It's just the CGI model they showed us that is crap. They shouldn't have done that ugly, textureless mockup. They could just have shown some concept art or something instead and people would have been very happy. You live and learn though.
People who (inexplicably) love the ship will feel better for said moderate tone.
I've been thinking more about why the trailer maker chose that angle. I think it was because they wanted to convey a sense of awesome size. After all, the delta seems to contain the same volume as the saucer, so the ship's capacity must be huge.First, it has to be borne in mind that the hero shot in the trailer was taken from the most unflattering angle possible.
I don't think I ever thought the Falcon was ugly. It's essentially a disc, which is a good shape, with an adjustable wrench jaw at the front, which gives it direction and a bit of attitude. The busy surface texture was preceeded by ships and tech in Space Odyssey and Silent Running. The cockpit is from a classic WWII bomber. The only oddity is the cockpit being skewed to one side.It's funny that you mention both the Serenity and the Millennium Falcon because objectively both ships are in fact ugly as sin!
Nice review. Agreed.I don't think I ever thought the Falcon was ugly. It's essentially a disc, which is a good shape, with an adjustable wrench jaw at the front, which gives it direction and a bit of attitude. The busy surface texture was preceeded by ships and tech in Space Odyssey and Silent Running. The cockpit is from a classic WWII bomber. The only oddity is the cockpit being skewed to one side.
I knew that as soon as I mentioned the Falcon some Star Wars nut would take offense (just joking). There's no such thing as "universally". The Millennium Falcon is a classic sci-fi design but an unattractive design nevertheless.I don't think I ever thought the Falcon was ugly. It's essentially a disc, which is a good shape, with an adjustable wrench jaw at the front, which gives it direction and a bit of attitude. The busy surface texture was preceeded by ships and tech in Space Odyssey and Silent Running. The cockpit is from a classic WWII bomber. The only oddity is the cockpit being skewed to one side.
Both the Nostromo and the Prometheus are symmetrical.There as aspects of the Falcon that I see in the asymmetric areas of the spacecraft from Alien and Prometheus.
So is the Falcon. A misshapen lump with heart! And that's why we love them both! And we're gonna love the Discovery too!Serenity, on the other hand, is a misshapen lump. But it's a misshapen lump with heart!
I wasn't talking about either of those ships, nor the Narcissus, because none of those appeared in both films I mentioned (Alien and Prometheus). I should have been more specific: There are aspects of the Falcon that I see in the asymmetric areas of the alien spacecraft from Alien and Prometheus.Both the Nostromo and the Prometheus are symmetrical.
I seriously doubt it.a deliberate combination of Klingon and Federation technology
I wasn't talking about either of those ships, nor the Narcissus, because none of those appeared in both films I mentioned (Alien and Prometheus). I should have been more specific: There are aspects of the Falcon that I see in the asymmetric areas of the alien spacecraft from Alien and Prometheus.
"The Millennium Falcon is ugly."
TBBS has officially jumped the shark.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.