This is the true test, here, as to whether this is really going to be a serious attempt to reinvigorate Star Trek. If they haven't written a part from Shatner and they go out of their way to squeeze him in, then we'll know nothing has changed.
Actually, my username and avatar are a tribute to the first role he played in Columbo. He played an actor named Ward Fowler who starred in a tv show as a Police Inspector named Lucerne. It was quite an entertaining performace, if just for the cheesiness of it all. In the Columbo he did in the 90's he played a different character and I'm not sure of his name in that one.Cary L. Brown said:
Does anyone remember the names of other Shatner series characters? I remember, for instance, a series called "Barbary Coast"... and he made two appearances (as the same guy?) on Columbo... and I'm sure he did some other stuff that got significant (if temporary) recognition...
Am I missing any major roles? I mean, we know TJ Hooker, Boston Legal, and obviously Star Trek...
Cary L. Brown said:
As much as I love the character of Kirk, and think that the character was defined by Bill Shatner more than by anything else (and thus any new portrayal MUST honor Bill Shatner's portrayal)... I'd feel cheated if they brought him back to life.
Then again, I was pissed off that they brought Spock back, too. I was TRULY MOVED by Spock's death. It had a great deal of emotional impact. To have them come back and then pull the rug out from underneath us... "Sorry, we were just kidding... everything is back just like it used to be... whooopeeeee!" sorta pissed me off.
Tralah said:
I'm probably the minority here,
Ezri said:
I would be upset if Shatner was ever again in a star trek movie or a star trek show period.
Starting out as a federation starship captain and ending his career as the spokesman of priceline.com. It is time to say, let Kirk stay DEAD.
nostradamus said:
My guess:
The majority of people who want Shatner in this movie simply are not that outspoken about it.
Maybe they dont even have the tendency to use internet forums.
It is always those people who DONT want something to happen who voice their "concerns" the loudest.
RookieBatman said:
Ezri said:
I would be upset if Shatner was ever again in a star trek movie or a star trek show period.
Starting out as a federation starship captain and ending his career as the spokesman of priceline.com. It is time to say, let Kirk stay DEAD.
Are you opposed to him making money? Keeping his career going? I don't understand why some people seem to have this idea that Shatner should keep the dignity befitting a starship captain. He's an actor. Not being remembered as only a starship captain is really good for the career. That's why none of the others ever did anything else; because they were remembered as only their Trek characters. What's wrong with being a pitchman? He's just making a living.
The only reason he got the part of Kirk in the first place nobody wanted to waste their career.
The job of an actor, as a general rule, is to be entertaining. Shatner's Kirk was, at LEAST as much as any other reason, why people watched Star Trek. He was the "leading man."Ezri said:I do not mind that he wants to make money. But, in my judgment he was never a good actor. Not in the 1950's or in TOS or in any other show.
When have you had to deal with Shatner? Did you two spend time on a stage play together? Were you a guest on TJ Hooker? C'mon, inquiring minds want to know!My point is this, he is one of the worst actors I ever had to deal with.
Aha... so you don't only hate Shatner, you hate Kirk, and you hate TOS. I don't see any other way to interpret that line... do you?The only reason he got the part of Kirk in the first place nobody wanted to waste their career.
If that's so, how do you explain the fact that Shatner is one of the most recognized entertainers in the WORLD?But, the show lives on but if they had a better actor the show could have been on during the early 1970's
Ezri said:
I do not mind that he wants to make money. But, in my judgment he was never a good actor. Not in the 1950's or in TOS or in any other show. My point is this, he is one of the worst actors I ever had to deal with. The only reason he got the part of Kirk in the first place nobody wanted to waste their career. But, the show lives on but if they had a better actor the show could have been on during the early 1970's
Cary L. Brown said:
People who say that the original characters sucked, the original actors sucked, the original ship sucked, the original show sucked... are either saying that they hate all things Trekkish (which is fair, but is inconsistent with hanging on on the TrekBBS, I think!), or they resent that their "preferred, newer shows" owe their existence to something that came before these so-called "fans" came along.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.