• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Discovery Size Argument™ thread

I think its gonna be sleeker than what we are seeing with the ones in this thread and the nacells are gonna look closer to what we have seen. Maybe round, but not retro and not JJ style.
 
I think its gonna be sleeker than what we are seeing with the ones in this thread and the nacells are gonna look closer to what we have seen. Maybe round, but not retro and not JJ style.

The wireframe of the Defiant shows something that looks 95% like a TOS Constitution, including cylindrical nacelles (with fins) and a deflector dish with antenna(e). I think the ship will pretty much look like the TOS ship, updated for modern audiences.
 
The wireframe of the Defiant shows something that looks 95% like a TOS Constitution, including cylindrical nacelles (with fins) and a deflector dish with antenna(e). I think the ship will pretty much look like the TOS ship, updated for modern audiences.


No, it shared a basic shape, but didn't look much like the TOS ship other than vague shape. We also could not see the full profile. I don;t think people wanting a retro look are gonna be happy.
 
The people who want a retro look are beyond parody!
How so?
So, one of your first posts here and you choose to insult a significant portion of the membership?
Personally I want to see a slightly updated 800 meter Connie that looks something like the mad koi ship with a better connecting dorsal.
I guess I’m beyond parody as are a significant number of people in the forum.
Don’t be a butthole sir or madame.
And please be more creative with passive aggressive insults if you are going to dabble.
 
How so?
So, one of your first posts here and you choose to insult a significant portion of the membership?
Personally I want to see a slightly updated 800 meter Connie that looks something like the mad koi ship with a better connecting dorsal.
I guess I’m beyond parody as are a significant number of people in the forum.
Don’t be a butthole sir or madame.
And please be more creative with passive aggressive insults if you are going to dabble.

You scared sir or madame away you MU beauty.
 
How so?
So, one of your first posts here and you choose to insult a significant portion of the membership?
Personally I want to see a slightly updated 800 meter Connie that looks something like the mad koi ship with a better connecting dorsal.
I guess I’m beyond parody as are a significant number of people in the forum.
Don’t be a butthole sir or madame.
And please be more creative with passive aggressive insults if you are going to dabble.
There is going to be some serious fallout if the Connie we see is that big, I will be absolutely fine with it but some wont be.

I think it will look great but they will really need to up the detail on it for it to look right.
 
I'd be surprised if they changed the Connie size to be bigger than it's always been. Just an updated aesthetic.
 
I don't even need to Constitution to be the largest ship, but the current sizes just seem off. It looks fricking tiny. Increasing it's size by about third would probably be sufficient to not make it look ridiculous next to Discovery and Shenzhou.
 
Last edited:
If the new ships were around the size of TOS ships, it would have made no difference to the story or VFX. We never see more than one shuttle at a time leaving the ship. It really wouldn't matter.
 
How? Isn't that why the put the bridge dome on SF ships? So the audience can get an idea of the scale?
 
How? Isn't that why the put the bridge dome on SF ships? So the audience can get an idea of the scale?

None of the stuff fits. The bay wpuld never fit, the bridge fome changed size and so on. The dome was on top because IRL navy bridges are on top
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top