• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Discovery or Andromeda?

I actually rewatched a couple of episodes of Andromeda recently and found it almost unwatachable. The pacing was always off for me, weak writing, poor directing, the look and feel was trashy, and Kevin Sorbo a terrible lead. I much preferred Farscape back in the day, it had a similar range of characters but the character development and writing was infinitely better.

No matter how season three of Discovery goes, it is bound to be far more watchable than Andromeda.
 
Where is the canon that it was the Romulan star that went Supernova?

That doesn't make sense if it propagated across subspace to destroy the Romulan system. It was clearly NOT in the Romulan system.
 
Where is the canon that it was the Romulan star that went Supernova?

That doesn't make sense if it propagated across subspace to destroy the Romulan system. It was clearly NOT in the Romulan system.
It's said repeatedly in star trek: picard that it was the romulan sun that went nova. The events of star trek 2009 were retconned.
 
Honestly I enjoyed the universe and world building of Andromeda more than Star Trek in some aspects and thought that Andromeda had some very interesting characters. I really like that sense of mysticism and all.
As for Sorbo...I take him over Bakula any day, but I remember that I've read that he was one of the reasons for all the behind-the-scenes drama that ultimately caused the show to become the rather medicore overall product it is now.

I still say even flawed as it is Andromeda is a much better show than Stargate, for example.
 
26k9Td7.gif
 
Is it just me or does Discovery season 3 have more in common with Andromeda than Star Trek?

Federation gone/Systems Commonwealth gone

One Federation/Commonwealth ship remains to rebuild

Nietzschean War/The Burn (external attack by ?)
As has been pointed out already, cut from the same cloth.

Certainly, there are differences, the UFP was a victim of an outer disaster rather than decay from within as in Andromeda. Discovery is less "Flash Gordon" pulp than Andromeda was. I'm almost certain Andromeda's budget was $800-1 million compared to Discovery's $8.5 million. My impression from only watching about a quarter of the series was it was pretty cheesy.

Also, if you want to get technical, the fall of big sci-fi "empires" trope started with Asimov's "Foundation" series which used "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" by Gibbons as it's basis, so quite a long time ago.

RAMA
 
I actually had some good discussions with Robert Hewitt Wolfe about the show before he left, and he always told me to be patient it would get better. Sorbo apparently thought his stories were too dense and complicated.

RAMA

I stopped watching Andromeda half-way through the first season back in 2000. Then I heard -- from most people -- that the show got worse after the middle of the second season. I tried watching again last year, but I couldn't stick with it, and only made it through a few episodes.

I don't think Andromeda is a series that should have the Final Word on the concept of a society rising from the ashes. Plus, I'm sorry to say, the concept speaks to 2020 a lot better than it did 2000.
 
I really wonder where it might have gone if RHW had stuck around.

The show wasn't entirely bereft of good episodes, it was just weighted strongly towards the cheese.

Anyway, it's not as though more contemporary Trek tends to have bragging rights for their first couple of seasons either.
 
I stopped watching Andromeda half-way through the first season back in 2000. Then I heard -- from most people -- that the show got worse after the middle of the second season. I tried watching again last year, but I couldn't stick with it, and only made it through a few episodes.

I don't think Andromeda is a series that should have the Final Word on the concept of a society rising from the ashes. Plus, I'm sorry to say, the concept speaks to 2020 a lot better than it did 2000.
Andromeda was really poorly executed and it's only redeeming feature was the storyline so no harm seeing it used by a better production.

And it's not a unique story anyway it's just the post apocalyptic story with spaceships and haseve been done by trek a little with Smiley and the MU
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top