Greg_Cox said:
I never thought it was a matter of Starfleet policy. Just an old-fashioned attitude that crept into the script for "Adonais."
One cringes today, but back in 1960s it was more or less expected that women would quit work once they settled down and got married.
To be fair, it's only the "leave the service" bit which pins it down as old-fashioned. If the interpretation were to instead be that Kirk was thinking that somebody who marries will want to start a family, and to facilitate that he/she would need to take a job away from a starship (because starships of this era do not carry families on board), then the entire premise could still stand up to scrutiny.
But yeah, the line about leaving the service does sound slightly off. Realistically she shouldn't need to leave 'the service' (Starfleet) as a whole, she'd simply be taking another assignment.
I would tend to agree with
Lance's take on this. Federation starships of this era may, from time to time, accommodate civilian passengers and specialists for certain missions, but starships were primarily for Starfleet personnel and there do not appear to be any facilities on board the Enterprise for nursing, daycare, or routine schooling like we see on the Enterprise-D. You can say "we saw kids enjoy themselves in the rec room during 'And the Children Shall Lead' ", but it's quite a leap to imagine a long-term resident population of kids aboard Kirk's Enterprise. Given this, it's logical to assume that Lt. Palamas, if she was known to be looking to find a mate, would certainly have to accept a "ground assignment" if she wanted to have a family. There is nothing explicit, only implicit, in the conversation between Kirk and McCoy that Lt. Palamas would be resigning to be a full-time homemaker. For all we know, she may continue with her Starfleet career as a married woman with kids, just not as part of the "star service" aboard a deep space vessel. It should be obvious from what we see in TOS that long-term family life and duty aboard a starship do not mix.
But back to the O.P.; there was only one character in TOS who was clearly said to be betrothed, by pre-arranged marriage: Spock. (In "Amok Time", he clearly referred to T'Pring as his wife.) Of course, that didn't go well.
Aside from Spock, it is disappointing that there are no TOS characters of either gender that come to mind as being married. There was the direct implication that crewmembers aboard a starship can marry, as seen in "Balance of Terror", and this leaves open the possibility that being in the "star service" is not incompatible with being married. I believe Dr. McCoy was supposedly divorced. There was no clear indication of the marital status of Scott, Uhura, Sulu, Chekov, Kyle, Chapel, Leslie or any of the other characters. It's a shame nobody ever thought of giving any of these characters a little more depth (or "backstory", in Hollywoodese), but TOS was originally going to be focused on Captain Kirk, with all the other characters simply supporting that role. It was only after the series got underway that TOS gradually evolved into more of an ensemble show. (Looks like it evolved by accident, if you ask me.)