That description left out Roddenberry's "She moved/walked like a "stripper queen."It what the character was supposed to be about.(The Making of Star Trek, p. 29)
I thought that was used for the description of Beverly Crusher in TNG?
That description left out Roddenberry's "She moved/walked like a "stripper queen."It what the character was supposed to be about.(The Making of Star Trek, p. 29)
I consider the COMPUTER VOICE she performed throughout the franchise to be her crowning achievement and I really mean that. I thought she always gave good readings, in that capacity.
I was just involved in the World of Star Trek thread and got to thinking:
The Suits didn't think Majel Barrett had the charisma and talent to pull off the role of the second billing.
Now, in reading Solow's book, I came away with two feelings: 1) That it made sense that an acting novice like Majel wouldn't have the right stuff to pull off the role and 2) I could be wrong but it seemed like the studio had a "mean streak" towards Majel simply because she was in a privileged position and Gene's mistress.
But what did you guys think?
Personally, I thought Majel was good in her rather limited role of Nurse Chapel, but I liked her in "What Are Little Girls Made Of?" which is the episode that probably featured her most.
And I liked her as Lwaxana Troi.
As Number One, she does come off as somewhat dry, distant and cold, but that's also how the character seemed to have been written.
I've been wondering if maybe the role just wasn't very good. I don't like the idea of never knowing her name and that she was this unapproachable character. I don't think it's Majel, rather I think the role was limited.
Thoughts?
I think a lot of the problem was the part she played. Nurse Chapel was a 2 dimensional character. She was pretty good in What are Little Girls Made of? and as Number One. Playing a woman of authority back then wasn't very common. Here she is in 1962 with James Doohan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gPmI0RXbUU
![]()
In terms of Majel's acting abilities, ask yourself this one question, if she hadn't been Roddenberry's girlfriend would she have even briefly been considered for the role?
Second (or third) billing on the show, based solely on her acting abilities?
I keep hearing this story, but no one ever quotes a source. So... source?...And it seems clear that GR frequently did just that, which is why it got so hard to find good actresses who were even willing to come in and read for Star Trek... This is why casting Miranda in "Is There in Truth no Beauty" went down to the wire, and they finally had to re-use Diana Muldaur with a black wig. We're lucky Majel Barrett didn't get the part, in a wig and elaborate make-up.
How "red" was that ridiculous beehive?...had that rediculous beehive...
...Here she is in 1962 with James Doohan.
Sir........................................How "red" was that ridiculous beehive?...had that rediculous beehive...![]()
I keep hearing this story, but no one ever quotes a source. So... source?...And it seems clear that GR frequently did just that, which is why it got so hard to find good actresses who were even willing to come in and read for Star Trek... This is why casting Miranda in "Is There in Truth no Beauty" went down to the wire, and they finally had to re-use Diana Muldaur with a black wig. We're lucky Majel Barrett didn't get the part, in a wig and elaborate make-up.
I keep hearing this story, but no one ever quotes a source. So... source?
Could you clarify?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.