So..Gene Roddenberry saw it as a way to make money and sleep with numerous women.
When people complain about newer Trek being dumb action and lacking morality tales then that's inaccurate to say Trek gets out on a pedestal?
So..Gene Roddenberry saw it as a way to make money and sleep with numerous women.
But, I did not think she should headline a show nor did I think her murdering people was justified the way Garak gets justified.
The acting won't save him for me.Probably because Garak was a minor operative who hadn’t bombed entire civilizations out of existence. Plus, we actually see him being punished for his crimes against Cardassia by way of his exile.
The acting and writing were top shelf where Garak is concerned.
The acting won't save him for me.
And he gets to return to Cardassia, his nemesis dead.
Noted.All I can say is to take some time to read “A Stitch in Time” by Andrew Robinson.
And he gets to return to Cardassia, his nemesis dead.
And he gets to return to Cardassia, his nemesis dead.
I disagree. Okay, sure, duplicitous. But he's loyal to Cardassia, not to be confused with the Dominion that Dukat sold Cardassia to. And he's trustworthy as long as you keep in mind that Cardassia is his first loyalty.The text of the show seems to say that this power is completely useful and Section 31 tactics are fine so long as the heroes do it. And I completely disagree with that.
Because he's untrustworthy, duplicitous, and owes no loyalty save to himself. That's why.
He's arguably the most selfless character on the show.I disagree. Okay, sure, duplicitous. But he's loyal to Cardassia, not to be confused with the Dominion that Dukat sold Cardassia to. And he's trustworthy as long as you keep in mind that Cardassia is his first loyalty.
He's pretty straightforward about it.
I agree with you. The dialogue between Garak and Bashir after the Dominion is defeated on Cardassia shows how deeply Garak cared and how devastated he was by all the destruction the people of Cardassia suffered at the hands of the Dominion.He's arguably the most selfless character on the show.
BASHIR: I'm sure we'll see each other again.
GARAK: I'd like to think so, but one can never say. We live in uncertain times."
Gene Roddenberry saw it as a way to make money and sleep with numerous women.
Ever seen Casablanca? What did you think of Captain Renault?Acting is not reason enough to enjoy a character for me if the morality questionable. Especially in Star Trek.
Garak was being punished for crimes against Cardassia? I don't remember the show ever pinning down why he was exiled. I think it's more likely he was exiled because Tain thought he was a possible rival for power.Probably because Garak was a minor operative who hadn’t bombed entire civilizations out of existence. Plus, we actually see him being punished for his crimes against Cardassia by way of his exile.
The acting and writing were top shelf where Garak is concerned.
Garak was being punished for crimes against Cardassia? I don't remember the show ever pinning down why he was exiled. I think it's more likely he was exiled because Tain thought he was a possible rival for power.
No.Ever seen Casablanca?
So his murder and deceiving Sisko is acceptable?I disagree. Okay, sure, duplicitous. But he's loyal to Cardassia, not to be confused with the Dominion that Dukat sold Cardassia to. And he's trustworthy as long as you keep in mind that Cardassia is his first loyalty.
He's pretty straightforward about it.
So his murder and deceiving Sisko is acceptable?
Ever seen Casablanca? What did you think of Captain Renault?
Do I like Renault? Would he be my best buddy if I were in 1941 Casablanca?
Would I want him to be removed from the movie?
No, no, and no.
Garak was being punished for crimes against Cardassia? I don't remember the show ever pinning down why he was exiled. I think it's more likely he was exiled because Tain thought he was a possible rival for power.
That wasn't the question. Garak was stated as being trustworthy except he deliberately lied to Sisko and murdered multiple people in the name of Sisko's operation.Is the Dominion overrunning the Alpha Quadrant acceptable? The Federation was irritating but in no way earned the reprisals that the Dominion brought down on them and the rest of the Alpha Quadrant.
It would be great if everyone played by the same rules, but they don't. It is that simple. If someone is playing by a different set of rules, one ends up being stupid to not also adapt to them where they can. If not, you end up losing.
Do you end up just keep throwing lives at them until you run out of resources?
Maybe I should.
But since I was told Star Trek is a guide to morality...
Garak isnt starfleet nor a part of the federation. He has a completely different set of values. Thats what made him interesting.and not a dumb action franchise then it's harder to take seriously Garak being valued as a character and championed as the potential lead for a show.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.