The 2006 movie didn't have confidence in that its own premise---Superman has been missing long enough for the world to move on without him.
The casting of the movie undercut the very premise with Lois and Jimmy seeming just as young (or younger) as in every other iteration.
I think it would have been much more effect to have, say, Dana Delany playing Lois. And have her as editor of the Planet as well.
Bryan Singer's X-Men movie was probably only good due to David Hayter's screenplay.
Apparently, Singer inhaling the fumes of 1978 prevented him from reading the room, where a clear nose/mind would've allowed him to discover the obvious: superhero content and most importantly, the fans changed out of creative desire, cultural necessity, and would not find his love letter to all things Salkind appealing to those who do not live in that halcyonic dream world--one that was not aging well less than a decade after its premiere.
Hmmm . . . I don't know. I thought the 2000 movie was okay, but it felt like an expensive "B" movie, instead of an "A" one. And I found the plot a bit questionable.
This is one reason why I have a problem with the whole nostalgia factor.
Stranger Things took 80s nostalgia and did quite well with it (at first, anyways). It served the characters and the plot, rather than the characters and plot being secondary to the nostalgia
X2 repeats it with "Magneto has a machine of DOOOOM!" thing again
Except Stryker is the inciting person.And then X2 repeats it with "Magneto has a machine of DOOOOM!" thing again.
Stranger Things isnt a 'nostalgia fest'; it's a period piece.
X2's plot is driven by Colonel Stryker, with Magneto only appropriating the Colonel's plans for his own ends at the Eleventh Hour.
Except Stryker is the inciting person.
It's similar only in broad strokes.Which still doesn't mean the climax isn't "Stopping Magneto's new Doom Machine".
It's similar only in broad strokes.
Looks like a scene from a video game. Not an attack, just it has that look especially with the backdrop.
Sooo....not like the ending of the first movie at all.Yeah, they needed that contrived ending where Jean decided to use her TK to hold back the water instead of lift the far lighter Blackbird jet out of the way.
Or...Storm makes the Cerebro room super cold to stop Jason instead of just walking over and smacking him in the head to knock him out. Which cost them precious time.
Or the X-Men breaking into the White House to bully the President like a bunch of terrorists.
Marvel movies are basically animated movies that don't have animated movie timelines to complete the film.Not to mention most of the movie coming out now also probably have a lot more and more complex VFX shots that they're trying to in probably the same or less amount of time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.