This is absurd.yes I absolutely terrified of what the Ellisons are going to do to Star Trek, since it's probably one of the absolute most liberal franchises out there.
This is absurd.yes I absolutely terrified of what the Ellisons are going to do to Star Trek, since it's probably one of the absolute most liberal franchises out there.
If damage is going to be done either way, I'd rather at least see less of it under the control of the giant orange shit bag and his shit head friends.My point is that such a change in the content of the stories, as distasteful as it would be, is a minor problem compared to the damage to the entertainment industry as a whole if either bidder succeeds in buying WB, because it means less competition, fewer job opportunities for creators, higher prices for consumers, everything that's bad about monopolies in general.
I think one of the main reasons Trump wants them to get WB is so they can get control CNN.Larry Ellison, if the stories are to be believed, has said if he gets control of Warner Bros-Discovery/HBO, he's going to replace several key positions at CNN with NewsMax and Breitbart people loyal to trump.
They're not that bad, they do at least call Trump out on his lies, and they air Have I Got News For You, which is practially South Parks levels of anti-Trump.Question is, how many people are actually watching CNN at this point? It is a business that is going to do business things. Honestly from what I hear, they aren’t too far off from being Trumpers anyways.
It's not Paramount wants that, it's Trump that wants it from all of the studios, I'm assuming because he's an immature man-child who can't handle the fact that things have changed in the last 40 years.With Rush Hour 4 confirmed, I understand Paramount wants to bring back the Hollywood filmmaking of the 80s, 90s, and even 2000s. I have no problem with that. But I do have a problem with the fact that they're doing this by bringing back directors and actors who were accused of harassment and canceled under Trump's wing.
No it's really not, they can't handle anything that doesn't follows their bullshit, and Star Trek is about as far from their bullshit as you can get. The things they hate more than anything are diversity, helping people, and people from different groups cooperating, and that's what Star Trek has been about since it started.This is absurd.
David Ellison? Post proof or retract.The things they hate more than anything are diversity, helping people, and people from different groups cooperating,
This is absurd.
He's Trump supporter, that's all the proof you need.David Ellison? Post proof or retract.
As I said, this is absurd.He's Trump supporter, that's all the proof you need.
Again, Paramount is now under the control of Trump supporters, so there's a more than likely chance they're going to try to force everything they produce to follow his agenda, which Star Trek definitely does not. Again I admit, I might have overblown how liberal it's been over the years, but Trek's philosophy and approach to things like diversity, multiculturalism, cooperation, and science about as far MAGA's non-stop racism, sexism, homophobia, isolationism, and their openly anti-science stance.As I said, this is absurd.
No, that's not terribly likely at all.OK I might have gone a bit overboard at first, it's definitely has been a little slow and hesitant to really embrace stuff like that, but it's still more liberal than anything that would be allowed under Trump controlled media.
Again, Paramount is now under the control of Trump supporters, so there's a more than likely chance they're going to try to force everything they produce to follow his agenda...
“Star Trek” as the Most Incredibly Liberal Anything Ever is overstated — remember, this is the franchise that dragged its feet on featuring gay characters for decades, to the point it was bringing up the absolute rear in finally doing so — but it’s sillier to act like the growing takeover of major media outlets by Trump devotees is not a legitimate concern.
You might be confusing him with his dad.He's Trump supporter, that's all the proof you need.
Which one? Dad Runs Oracle. Son runs Skydance. Does Daddy have input? Probably?I thought the dad was the one in control of the company?
I'm convinced of nothing. You're the one panicking about remote and unlikely events as if they're absolutely certain to occur.Why are you so convinced it's not going to happen?
Most people seem to be expecting Skydance to be doing Trump's bidding,
Either they're assholes, or complete morons. I can be at least a little forgiving of people who fell his shit the first time, but anybody who voted for him a second can just go to hell.I'm convinced of nothing. You're the one panicking about remote and unlikely events as if they're absolutely certain to occur.
Here's some bad news: nearly 80 million people voted for the dickhead. If that alone is absolute proof that they're all mindlessly cruel Trumpbots then we're already doomed and you might as well crawl into a deep hole to await the end.
Well, the intelligent people who are actually aware of what's going on.Not "most people." Most people you apparently pay attention to.
There’s been an entire cottage industry for the past decade among academics, journalists, and pundits determined to prove the contrary. The results have been unconvincing at best.Here's some bad news: nearly 80 million people voted for the dickhead. If that alone is absolute proof that they're all mindlessly cruel Trumpbots
Do "most people" have something back their claims?Most people seem to be expecting Skydance to be doing Trump's bidding, so it sounds like either the son is just as much of a Trumper, or he'll just be doing whatever dad wants him to.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.