• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC Cinematic Universe ( The James Gunn era)

I'd hope not. The Alex Ross "S" has grown on me.

It's sleeker and more modern, and more plausible as a Kryptonian glyph than a shape that is an English "S" right down to the head and tail serifs.

And, let's get nitpicky - Clark and Kara share a uniform design, but has it been established in the DCU that the shield is associated with their family specifically?

I don't suppose Clark knows much of anything about Kryptonian culture other than what his parents looked and sounded like...
Depends on the version were talking about. Some like the Reeves movies, there is an active hologram/ matrix full of Kryptonian knowledge, and an interactive program of his parents. Others he has basically nothing of Krypton, maybe a "Photo" of his parents.
 
Yeah, I'm talking about this version.

At the least, we don't see the kind of museum collection or display of Kryptonian artifacts we've seen in some old comic book versions.
 
Someone in another forum posted a theory that the reason Zaslav said "ten year plan" in his press release is that, starting in 2035, the first of the DC comics characters, starting with Dr. Occult, enters into the public domain and WB/DC need to get characters updated for the 21st century, so writers won't be able to use certain aspects of them.
 
Someone in another forum posted a theory that the reason Zaslav said "ten year plan" in his press release is that, starting in 2035, the first of the DC comics characters, starting with Dr. Occult, enters into the public domain and WB/DC need to get characters updated for the 21st century, so writers won't be able to use certain aspects of them.
Most of the characters have been updated countless times since the thirties and forties. One rarely sees the Superman from Action Comics #1. (and that's the version that goes PD in '38) And with the Earth-2 Superman from the 1960s some elements have been "recreated". I hope DC has copywrite on the E-2 elements.
 
I've previously come across people online claiming the latest DC Comics changes would be made to keep the characters out of public domain. Which is not at all how this works.

As @Nerys Myk correctly points out, the version of Superman that will become public domain in thirteen years is the version that was depicted in Action Comics #1, a very limited version of Superman. Elements that will still by protected under copyright are, among others, several of Superman's most iconic powers (first and foremost flight, but also super-senses and heat vision), the Daily Planet, Kryptonite, being raised by the Kents, Smallville, Perry White, Jimmy Olsen, Lex Luthor, the city of Metropolis, all the most-famous variants of the S-shield, Superman being a public figure working with government authorities, Supergirl, Krypto, the Fortress of Solitude, his home planet being called Krypton, his birth parents being Jor-El and Lara, and a whole lot more.

The version of the character that could be used under the public domain is very, very limited and lacks several of the key parts that a wider audience expects from Superman media.
 
As @Nerys Myk correctly points out, the version of Superman that will become public domain in thirteen years is the version that was depicted in Action Comics #1, a very limited version of Superman. Elements that will still by protected under copyright are, among others, several of Superman's most iconic powers (first and foremost flight, but also super-senses and heat vision), the Daily Planet, Kryptonite, being raised by the Kents, Smallville, Perry White, Jimmy Olsen, Lex Luthor, the city of Metropolis, all the most-famous variants of the S-shield, Superman being a public figure working with government authorities, Supergirl, Krypto, the Fortress of Solitude, his home planet being called Krypton, his birth parents being Jor-El and Lara, and a whole lot more.

It's slightly more complicated. The Fleischer Superman cartoons are in the public domain, because DC forgot to renew the copyright. That means that any aspect of Superman that was introduced in the cartoons, most notably flight, the opening narration and the Telephone booth, are fair game to use with the 1938 version of Superman when he becomes public domain.
 
If it goes the way it went after Winnie the Pooh, Steamboat Willie and Popeye went public domain, we will see Superman become a mass killer who leaps tall buildings to knife people.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top