It wouldn't surprise me if we got a trailer during the Super Bowl.
Superbowlman?
I'll see myself out...
It wouldn't surprise me if we got a trailer during the Super Bowl.
Superman and the FF on Super Bowl Sunday.
The executor of the estate of a “Superman” co-creator sued DC Comics Inc. and Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. Friday, attempting to block use of the superhero character and story in several major foreign markets, including in an upcoming July movie premiere.
The assignment of the rights to the Superman story under copyright law in countries like Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Australia automatically terminated 25 years after the author’s death, according to the complaint filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The suit, filed by Mark Warren Peary, said co-creator of the Superman character and story Joseph Shuster passed away in 1992, and co-creator Jerome Siegel passed away in 1996. Peary filed the suit individually and in his capacity as executor of Shuster’s estate.
Someone will cut a cheque.
https://deadline.com/2025/01/superm...iscovery-dc-comics-summer-release-1236274354/At issue are foreign copyrights to the original Superman character and story, coauthored by Jerome Siegel and Shuster. Though Siegel and Shuster assigned worldwide Superman rights to DC’s predecessor in 1938 “for a mere $130 ($65 each), the copyright laws of countries with the British legal tradition—including Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Australia—contain provisions automatically terminating such assignments 25 years after an author’s death, vesting in the Shuster Estate the co-author’s undivided copyright interest in such countries,” the suit said.
“Shuster died in 1992 and Siegel in 1996. By operation of law, Shuster’s foreign copyrights automatically reverted to his estate in 2017 in most of these territories (and in 2021 in Canada). Yet Defendants continue to exploit Superman across these jurisdictions without the Shuster Estate’s authorization—including in motion pictures, television series, and merchandise—in direct contravention of these countries’ copyright laws, which require the consent of all joint copyright owners to do so.”
I'm confused. If the rights to the character expired, then shouldn't that make Superman public domain in those countries?
No, the rights would revert back to the Estate (at least that's the Estate's legal argument <--- Read they want money/a new deal for those territories.)I'm confused. If the rights to the character expired, then shouldn't that make Superman public domain in those countries? Surely that wouldn't be grounds to block WB from releasing a movie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.